Christie's back to old self, a day after being cleared
TRENTON, N.J. — The usually garrulous Republican Gov. Chris Christie avoided news conferences and interviews for more than two months until Thursday, the day a report he commissioned cleared him of any involvement in the politically motivated plot to cause huge traffic jams at the George Washington Bridge last year.
Christie submitted to interviews taped for ABC and Fox News. In the interview with Fox's Megyn Kelly, Christie said the scandal won't harm his long-term political plans.
And a vintage, defiant Christie re-emerged on Friday at a Statehouse news conference in which he cracked jokes, jousted with reporters and acknowledged the toll of the scrutiny.
“There is no question this shakes your confidence,” he said. “If it doesn't, you're arrogant.”
Christie defended the integrity of the taxpayer-funded report clearing him. It was produced by lawyers chosen by his office.
“I think the report will stand the test of time,” he said.
Christie announced the resignation of David Samson as chairman of the Port Authority, which runs the bridge.
Samson, a former New Jersey attorney general, was a Christie appointee who has not been accused of involvement in the lane closings but whose business dealings have come under scrutiny as the scandal unfolded.
Samson's law firm was representing a business that was undertaking a redevelopment project in Hoboken. The city's Democratic mayor, Dawn Zimmer, has said that members of Christie's cabinet threatened to withhold Superstorm Sandy aid unless she backed the plan. Christie's administration denies that.
Samson was the subject of reports this year that found businesses he represented may have benefited from Port Authority actions.
He said in a statement that he had planned to step down from the chairman job anyway.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Supreme Court’s health care law ruling worries 34 states
- Huge, ancient quasar could alter theories on black holes
- Monarch butterflies find milkweed supply dwindles
- Perceived slights have some New Yorkers longing for Pennsylvania
- Homeland Security panned for passing on bio-threat technology
- Florida fisherman’s high court win spurs call for legal reform
- Paul edges Walker in CPAC straw poll
- Most young Republicans back legal marijuana
- Gene making human brains bigger found
- Regulators approve tougher rules for Internet providers
- Why would GOP candidate for Missouri governor Schweich kill himself?