Share This Page

Finding Alois seeks to unravel mystery of suspected Nazi who saved Austrian Jewish family

| Saturday, April 5, 2014, 7:39 p.m.

NEW HAVEN, Conn. — Students at a Connecticut university are working on a daunting assignment: Who was the suspected Nazi who protected a Jewish family 75 years ago from violence and warned them to flee Austria just before World War II broke out?

The University of New Haven students just have a first name and a few other clues. They are scouring records from the 1930s, conducting interviews and may visit Austria to unravel the mystery on behalf of the elderly survivors who want to honor their savior.

“We are closing in. There's still a lot of work to do. I feel confident as I did when we started this that we will identify this individual,” said David Schroeder, who teaches the special investigations class called Finding Alois. “I think the students during the course of this investigation are exposed to a level of understanding about World War II and the Holocaust and what happened to the peoples of Europe than they could ever be in any classroom.”

Ilie Wacs and his sister, Deborah Strobin, recount their family's ordeal in their book, “An Uncommon Journey.”

The man they knew only as Alois warned them to take shelter in their apartment with relatives and they would be safe. The warning arrived days before Kristallnacht, when the Nazis staged a wave of attacks on Jews in Germany and Austria.

Wacs, an 86-year-old retired fashion designer who lives in New York City, said he heard the sound of boots walking up the stone steps and pausing in front of his family's apartment for several minutes before the Nazis left.

“We were never bothered,” Wacs said, recalling the sounds of shop windows smashed and the screams as people were dragged from their homes.

Alois, who worked in their father's tailor shop in Vienna, helped the family get visa extensions to stay in Austria. He warned them to get out before Aug. 31, 1939, the day before Germany invaded Poland and World War II broke out.

“We probably would have wound up in a concentration camp,” Wacs said.

Wacs, who was 12 at the time, said he believes Alois was a member of the Nazi Party and perhaps a high-ranking one because of how he was able to help his family.

It's unclear why Alois helped a Jewish family while apparently serving the Nazis. Wacs said it's possible he was forced into the party as a young man and helped his family because he knew them.

Wacs said he was reluctant to delve into the matter for fear the man who saved them might have later committed atrocities. But he has decided he wants to know who he is so he can be honored with the title of “Righteous Gentile.”

“It's hard for me to imagine that after saving us at great risk to himself he would commit atrocities,” Wacs said. “I wanted to remember him as one of the good guys.”

Schroeder and his students learned of the case while visiting the Museum of Tolerance in New York. Schroeder said they realize Alois might not be alive, given that he would be in his 90s, but they're hoping at least to locate his descendants.

Dean Velodota is among the students who interviewed Wacs and is visiting the Holocaust Museum in Washington to look at visa records of Wacs' mother, hoping the man's name will be on them. The students are using social media, making a Facebook page and reaching out to students in Europe to see if they'll help.

The students are trying to track down a survivor who lived above the tailor shop. They're also looking into records of unions representing tailors and records of shops for employees.

Wacs said he has been impressed by the students' efforts and believes there is a good chance they will identify Alois. If they do, he said, he would thank Alois or his descendants and offer any help he needed.

“It was a tremendous act of courage to do that because he risked his own life,” Wacs said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.