Oklahoma rattled by increase in earthquakes
Oklahoma, a state known more for tornadoes than seismic shifts, is becoming all too familiar with earthquakes.
In the week that ended on Saturday, 48 quakes larger than the magnitude of 2.5 struck, said Paul Caruso, a geophysicist with the U.S. Geological Survey. In the past month, there have been 157 quakes larger than magnitude 2.5.
“We've never seen anything like this in Oklahoma,” Caruso said.
The recent shaking has rattled residents' nerves — and has led to speculation and debates about what's behind the quakes. Some people have taken to social media and public forums, contending that hydraulic fracturing, known as fracking, and the deep-injection wells used for disposal of fracking wastewater could be causing the uptick.
A Oklahoma Geological Survey report in February says it “has not ruled out that some earthquakes may have a relationship to oil and gas activities such as water disposal/injection, and examining these issues remains a major focus of ongoing research.”
Yet the report adds that “the majority, but not all, of the recent earthquakes appear to be the result of natural stresses, since they are consistent with the regional Oklahoma natural stress field.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Social Security’s $300M IT project doesn’t work
- Massachusetts teen held in teacher’s slaying accused assaulting detention center worker
- Man told transit police the Boston Marathon bomber ‘was my best friend’
- Mont. senator’s thesis appears to have been plagarized
- Head of troubled CDC anthrax lab quits
- Ariz. inmate’s execution apparently botched
- Mountaineer workers fear smoking ban will harm ‘livelihood’
- Sketch of suspect released in peacock’s shooting death in Calif.
- U.S. knew Islamist militants planned offensive in Iraq, lawmakers told
- Fire season expected to accelerate
- Obamacare enrollees strain Medicaid in Oregon