In book out today, retired justice outlines amendment ideas
WASHINGTON — In the aftermath of the Connecticut school shootings that left 20 first-graders and six educators dead, retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens began thinking about ways to prevent a repeat.
The result is Stevens' new book — his second since retiring from the court at age 90 — in which he calls for no fewer than six changes to the Constitution, of which two are directly related to guns. Others would abolish the death penalty, make it easier to limit spending on elections and rein in partisan drawing of electoral districts.
Stevens argues for a 5-word change to the Second Amendment: “the right of the people to keep and bear arms — when serving in the Militia —shall not be infringed,” adding the middle section.
His proposed amendments generally would overrule major Supreme Court decisions with which he disagrees, including ones on guns and campaign finance in which he dissented.
The book, “Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution,” is being published on Tuesday, two days after Stevens' 94th birthday.
Stevens said that the Newtown, Conn., shootings in 2012 made him think about doing “whatever we could to prevent such a thing from happening again.”
One amendment would allow Congress to force state participation in gun checks, while a second would change the Second Amendment to permit gun control. Stevens was on the losing end of a 5-4 decision in 2008 in District of Columbia v. Heller, in which the court declared for the first time that Americans have a right to own a gun for self-defense.
He acknowledged that his proposed change would allow Congress to do something unthinkable in today's environment: ban gun ownership altogether.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Expert: Stress level rises for Americans who forfeit vacation
- Accused head of violent Mexican cartel nabbed
- Wreckage of sunken WWII U-boat found off N.C. coast
- Archaeologists sift through Everglades muck for history
- Ex-NSA chief drops deal with former aide to avoid appearance of conflict
- 5 airports to handle all U.S.-bound travelers from Ebola-stricken nations
- Wrongful imprisonment case ends in guilty plea
- Teen’s pre-existing condition lead to death
- American free of virus
- Governor to form Ferguson Commission to study underlying social issues in shooting
- Maryland man set for trial in killing erroneously released