Departing NTSB chair's advice: Put child-safety seats on planes
WASHINGTON — Deborah Hersman, departing chair of the National Transportation Safety Board, said on Monday that “one of her great disappointments” was that child-safety seats aren't required on planes for young children.
During a farewell speech at the National Press Club after 10 years on the board, Hersman recalled the different outcomes for two children aboard United Flight 232, which crashed in 1989 in Sioux City, Iowa. The crash killed 185 people, and 111 survived.
Two sets of parents with small children were told to brace for impact by placing infants on the floor cushioned with blankets.
The plane approached the runway at 240 mph, cartwheeled and caught on fire, and parents were unable to find the children when evacuating. A passenger heard an 11-month-old girl crying and carried her out.
“Those mothers couldn't hold onto their babies,” Hersman said. “Nobody could have.”
She was joined on the dais by Jan Brown, a flight attendant who blocked a parent from going back into the burning plane to look for her 22-month-old son, who died of asphyxiation from the smoke. Brown has lobbied for 25 years to require child-safety seats for children on planes, but the Federal Aviation Administration hasn't adopted that recommendation.
Federal regulations allow parents to hold children as old as 2 in their laps on flights. The NTSB urged the FAA to develop regulations for restraining children during takeoff, landing and turbulence, putting children weighing up to 40 pounds in child-restraint systems approved for their height and weight.
“When I came on the board in 2004, it was almost unbelievable that that was still allowed to go on,” Hersman said of unbelted children on airliners, in contrast to state laws requiring child-safety seats in cars. “They're just as valuable in the airplane as they are in the car.”
She is leaving the NTSB to become head of the National Safety Council, where she hopes to continue advocating on a broad range of safety issues.
The FAA recommends — rather than requires — that a child weighing less than 20 pounds use a rear-facing child restraint system. A forward-facing child-safety seat should be used for children weighing 20 to 40 pounds. The FAA has approved one harness-type device for children weighing 22 to 44 pounds.
When purchasing tickets, parents and caregivers should contact the airline to find out whether discounts are available for children because buying a ticket for a child is the only way to guarantee that a child-safety seat can be used during flight.
Airlines say parents should check before flying to make sure their child restraint is approved.
The International Air Transport Association, which represents airlines worldwide, will hold a workshop in May on cabin safety that will include a panel about governments coordinating standards for which child-safety restraints are permissible on planes.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pair of NYC officers killed in ambush shooting
- Killer of New York police officers angry over Garner chokehold death, officials say
- Poor morale, training in Air Force ICBM program spur questions about usefulness as nuclear deterrent
- 4 Afghans freed from Guantanamo
- Document hunt to begin for illegals who need proof of residency since 2010 for permit, reprieve
- Cat saved from California storm drain after 2 weeks
- N.Y. reports crime decrease, credits ‘broken windows’
- Teenager who attacked California Highway Patrol officer with machete shot, killed
- Financial fraudster used investors’ lucre to freeze dead wife, feds contend
- West Virginia man dies after being shot with arrow in Wellsburg
- Traffic camera use upheld in Ohio