N.J. lawmakers subpoenaed on bridge probe
TRENTON, N.J. — New Jersey lawmakers investigating the traffic jams at the heart of the scandal engulfing Gov. Chris Christie said Friday that federal prosecutors have ordered them to share documents they have gathered.
The committee co-chairs, Sen. Loretta Weinberg and Assemblyman John Wisniewski, said in a statement that they will comply.
“This reaffirms our progress in uncovering important information about the apparent abuse of government power and threat to public safety,” they said.
Lawmakers and federal prosecutors have been probing the September lane closures near the George Washington Bridge.
They were ordered by an ex-aide to Christie and a former official at the transit agency that runs the bridge as political retribution aimed at the mayor of Fort Lee, the town where traffic was tied up.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Poll finds most Americans want health insurance subsidies restored if Supreme Court votes against Obamacare provision
- N.D. didn’t inspect pipe before rupture
- Ancient Israeli skull hard proof of migration
- Police to Waze: Not so fast on cop tracker, which they say makes it harder to catch speeders
- Girl’s fatal shooting by Denver officers prompts review of policy
- Federal Highway Trust Fund running on empty
- Deadly fire in Maryland started in faulty electrical outlet, spread to Christmas tree
- Number of children on food stamps hits 6-year high
- Prosecutors fight new try to relocate Boston trial
- Treasure hunter accused of swindling investors captured
- Arkansas rejects proposal to celebrate Gen. Lee, MLK on different days