62 N.J. students arrested for senior prank gone awry
TEANECK, N.J. — Sixty-two students were arrested on Thursday for breaking into their high school overnight as a senior class prank, urinating in hallways, greasing doorknobs with petroleum jelly and taping hot dogs to lockers.
Officers responding to a burglar alarm at Teaneck High School shortly after 2 a.m. found desks flipped over, chairs broken, graffiti on the walls, silly string on the floors and balloons throughout the building.
Even before entering the building, officers could see many students through the windows, police said.
Police from more than a dozen neighboring towns plus county law enforcement officers were called in to help.
They used police dogs in their room-by-room roundup of students, some of whom were hiding.
“It is possible that a few got away, but the majority were caught,” Acting police Chief Robert Carney said.
He said the students told officers that it was a senior prank — an annual tradition at the northern New Jersey school of 1,300 students, though it is typically not this involved.
As they were arrested, Carney said, some students were scared, but others were laughing.
“If this was a senior class prank, I just don't believe that a lot of them realize the seriousness of it as far as breaking into the building,” Sgt. John Garland said. “That's a burglary, and I don't think they understand that. It's a very serious offense.”
The 24 students who are 18 or older were charged with burglary and criminal mischief. The 38 juveniles were released to their parents.
Teaneck school Superintendent Barbara Pinsak said at a news conference that the district is considering disciplining students.
“The district continues to assess the situation and is considering the consequen-ces that we'll impose on any students implicated,” she said.
Pinsak said the school was cleaned up in time for classes.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Edible pot ban proposed, yanked in Colorado
- Earth heads for record 2014
- Over 3 years, extended federal leave adds up to $775M
- Indiana slaying suspect hints at more deaths
- Revised Ebola guidelines stress full gear, training
- GOP governors don’t see ‘Obamacare’ going away
- High court will take case on gun ownership
- Navy civilian goes on trial for diverting $2M to brother of his boss
- Congress examines NSA official’s part-time job
- Crowd at Met protests ‘Death of Klinghoffer,’ calling opera anti-Semitic
- EPA hopes grants will reduce Lake Erie algae