Gulf Coast officials, FEMA meet over flood insurance
WASHINGTON — Homeowners who experience higher federal flood insurance premiums should work with their agents to make sure they are paying the correct rates under the new law, federal officials said on Thursday.
“A lot of changes happened just in the last few weeks,” said David Miller, associate administrator for the federal insurance and mitigation administration at the Federal Emergency Management Agency. “We are going to get some people caught in some in-betweens.”
Miller and other FEMA officials met with Gulf Coast lawmakers on Thursday to discuss the status of implementing the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act. Congress passed the law earlier this year to block dramatic increases in premiums paid by some property owners covered under the federal flood insurance program. President Obama signed the bill into law in March.
“Passing the bill is only part of it,” Rep. Bill Cassidy, R-La., told FEMA officials. “How y'all are interpreting it and implementing it is on everybody's mind.”
Cassidy, co-chairman of the Congressional Home Protection Caucus, and other Gulf Coast lawmakers championed the measure, saying hundreds of constituents were in jeopardy of skyrocketing rate increases that posed tremendous costs for local economies.
Under the law, premiums under the National Flood Insurance Program can increase no more than 18 percent per property annually.
The premium increases were required under a 2012 law known as Biggert-Waters, which was designed to make the government's flood insurance program financially solvent by bringing rates in line with true flooding risks.
Premiums under the program have been heavily subsidized by taxpayers, and the program is $24 billion in debt.
The 2014 law also repeals a provision in the Biggert-Waters law that increases premiums — up to the full-risk rate over five years — when FEMA adopts new flood maps.
Gulf Coast lawmakers said they called for the FEMA meeting to learn what steps the agency is taking and how to make sure policyholders get the right information.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Nurse defies Maine quarantine in standoff over Ebola
- Hungry Yosemite National Park bears tracked by GPS
- Environmental groups to spend $85 million in midterm elections
- Hawaii’s National Guard sent to lava flow site
- Few knew of cyber attack on White House computer network