Share This Page

Bitcoins OK'd for campaign donations

| Thursday, May 8, 2014, 9:12 p.m.

WASHINGTON — Bitcoin, the fast-growing digital currency, is coming to political campaigns.

The Federal Election Commission unanimously approved its use as a political donation on Thursday, after months of debate on the issue.

Commissioners imposed several conditions. Among them: No anonymous bitcoin contributions will be allowed, and campaign treasurers must scrutinize the donations for “evidence of illegality.”

Jim Harper, global policy counsel of the industry's Bitcoin Foundation, said the FEC's move lends further legitimacy to the computer-generated currency. “It's another part of the growing body of regulation that establishes bitcoin as a co-equal part of the financial services system,” he said.

Rep. Jared Polis, a liberal Democrat from Colorado and a bitcoin backer, immediately announced his campaign would begin accepting the digital money. He praised the FEC for its “forward-looking stance” to recognize “the rights of individuals seeking alternatives to government-backed currencies to participate in our democratic political process.”

However, it's not clear how quickly the currency will spread through the election landscape. Officials with the campaign committee working to elect House Democrats said they had no immediate plans to begin accepting bitcoin. Other Democratic and Republican committees did not immediately respond to interview requests.

Political observers say they expect bitcoin's use to be embraced first by candidates cultivating voters in libertarian-leaning and tech-savvy circles where the currency first gained acceptance. “You may not see a lot of establishment candidates in the parties” rushing to accept the currency just yet, said Michael Toner, a Washington campaign-finance lawyer and a former FEC chairman.

Even without the formal approval of regulators, the Libertarian Party began accepting bitcoin about a year ago and has collected the equivalent of about $10,000, party executive director Wes Benedict said Thursday. Many Libertarians would prefer a gold-backed currency and contributing bitcoin “shows a little bit of protest against Federal Reserve policies,” he said.

At the state level, Republican Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott announced last month that he would accept the virtual currency as an “in-kind” contribution to his bid for state governor. A fellow Texas Republican, Rep. Steve Stockman, accepted the currency in his failed Senate bid.

The commission is the latest federal agency to offer guidance on the digital currency, which operates independently of governments and banks. The IRS recently said it would tax bitcoin as property, not currency.

The FEC's action was in response to a request brought by a single political action committee, Make Your Laws PAC, which pledged to accept no more than $100 worth of bitcoin from each contributor per election.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.