Candidate who took on 'American Idol' singer Aiken in N.C. primary dies
ASHEBORO, N.C. — The entrepreneur who was locked in a too-close-to-call Democratic primary with former “American Idol” singer Clay Aiken died on Monday, his family said.
Keith Crisco, 71, died “after an accidental fall” at his home in Asheboro, about 65 miles west of Raleigh, according to a statement from his family.
“He was a remarkable man with a tremendous dedication to his family and to public service,” the statement said.
Aiken was leading Crisco by fewer than 400 votes in the contest, held on April 29. Unless Crisco can move ahead during a final tally of the votes this week, Aiken will be the nominee, spokesman Josh Lawson said. If Crisco wins, local Democrats would select the nominee, Lawson said.
The nominee will square off against Republican incumbent Renee Ellmers in November in the GOP-leaning 2nd Congressional District.
Crisco had been North Carolina's top business recruiter for four years under former Gov. Beverly Perdue, who left office in 2013. Crisco was born to a Republican family on a dairy farm and earned an MBA from Harvard University.
He spent a year in President Richard Nixon's Commerce Department and had a career in textile manufacturing.
Aiken, 35, said he was “stunned and deeply saddened” by his opponent's death and temporarily suspended all campaign activities.
“Keith came from humble beginnings. No matter how high he rose — to Harvard, to the White House and to the governor's cabinet — he never forgot where he came from,” Aiken said in a statement. “He was a gentleman, a good and honorable man, and an extraordinary public servant. I was honored to know him.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.