Bureau of Land Management investigation could lead to charges against Utah ATV riders
SALT LAKE CITY — The Bureau of Land Management has begun an investigation that could lead to charges against nearly 50 people who rode ATVs on an off-limits trail last weekend in Utah to show their displeasure with the federal government.
The agency is working to determine who broke the law and what happened on Saturday, Bureau of Land Management spokeswoman Megan Crandall said. A damage assessment is planned of Recapture Canyon, home to dwellings, artifacts and burials left behind by Ancestral Puebloans as many as 2,000 years ago before the tribe mysteriously vanished, she said.
The agency warned riders all week to stay out, vowing prosecution against those who ignore a law put in place in 2007 when an illegal trail was found that cuts through the ancestral ruins. The canyon is open to hikers and horseback riders.
Bureau of Land Management law enforcement officers were at the protest in plain clothes recording and documenting who was there, said Crandall, who added that the agency remains committed to holding the riders accountable.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Kentucky clerk invokes ‘God’s authority,’ still refuses gay marriage licenses
- Clinton: Women ‘expect’ extremism from terrorists, not GOP candidates
- Less sleep increases your chance of catching a cold, researchers say
- Supreme Court rules against Kentucky county clerk on gay marriage licenses
- Gas boom brings successes, struggles to W.Va. communities
- Russia, China ply cyberdata to exploit U.S. spies
- Lost hiker survived 9 days with broken leg in California’s Sierra Nevada
- FDA approves female sex pill, but with safety limits
- Tourists unfazed by Hawaiian water alert
- Trump starts new media feud with Univision anchor Ramos
- Virginia reporter, cameraman killed on air; gunman also dies