Descendants of 1st soldier buried at Arlington help mark cemetery's 150th anniversary
ARLINGTON, Va. — Generations of descendants of the first soldier laid to rest at Arlington National Cemetery commemorated the burial's 150th anniversary on Tuesday with a wreath-laying ceremony.
The ceremony at the grave of Union Pvt. William Christman kicked off a month of activity marking the sesquicentennial of the cemetery, across the Potomac River from the nation's capital.
Christman, a member of the 67th Pennsylvania Infantry, was buried on May 13, 1864. He had contracted measles. The land was officially designated as a military cemetery a month later.
James Christman of Allentown, a great-grandnephew, said he and his cousins had no idea their ancestor had served in the Civil War, much less that he was the first soldier buried at Arlington. They found out this year when contacted by a local historical association. Christman said he suspects his grandfather knew of the honor, which has been well documented at Arlington, but that he never bothered to tell anyone.
“My grandfather was a man of few words,” Christman said.
The Christman family continued to have a long history of military service, even as the family's service in the Civil War had been forgotten.
Standing in the rows of graves, great-grandniece Barbara Christman Page of Swiftwater in Monroe County thought about how her great-granduncle was the first of 400,000 from the nation's wars to be buried at Arlington.
“It is just so overwhelming,” she said.
The cemetery dots land that had been the home of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee. The Union army occupied the estate after Virginia seceded from the Union and turned it into a burial ground in part as a way to spite Lee.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Despite sunny forecast, South Carolina ordeal far from over
- Hillary Clinton kept in touch with key donors, emails show
- Top general in Afghanistan: U.S. strike on hospital a mistake
- Survivor: Oregon college gunman spared 1 to give police a message
- Coast Guard believes El Faro container ship sank
- Passenger train derails in Vermont; 7 injured
- Mine blast trial puts spotlight on Massey’s ‘King Coal’
- Benghazi transcript on way, defying GOP leaders on committee
- Supreme Court won’t hear insider trading case
- Oregon shooter ranted in manifesto about having no girlfriend
- Deluge exhausts South Carolina residents