For-profit colleges gird for battle on student debt rules
WASHINGTON — As the Obama administration prepares to establish rules governing for-profit colleges this year, student advocates and the career college industry are waging a fierce battle to shape the coming regulations.
Stakeholders on both sides of the debate are ramping up their push on the administration just as the public comment period on a proposed “gainful employment” regulation is set to close May 26.
Under the proposal that the administration presented in March, colleges would have to demonstrate that graduates' debt load on average does not exceed 30 percent of their discretionary earnings or 12 percent of their total earnings.
The rules would put programs whose graduates have debt-to-income ratios of 8 to 12 percent or debt-to-discretionary-income ratios of 20 to 30 percent in a danger zone, which would require the schools to warn students that they might become ineligible for federal aid.
The administration pointed to the fact that students at for-profit colleges represent about 13 percent of the higher-education population but are responsible for nearly half of all college loan defaults.
Some are arguing that the proposal laid out by the administration does not go far enough.
Student advocates from groups such as Young Invincibles and CREDO Mobile are calling for the regulations to include financial relief for students at institutions that lose eligibility to federal aid, enrollment limits on poorly performing schools and stricter standards.
“I think the new rules would slow what's going on,” said Mike DiGiacomo, 33, of Randolph, Mass., who racked up more than $85,000 in debt and lent his story to a CREDO online petition that has garnered more than 100,000 signatures. “But they are really just putting a Band-Aid on the problem.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- CIA admits Senate was spied on
- Law enforcement, intelligence agencies want to ‘like’ you on social media
- Congress considers dangers of driving high
- FDA will regulate labs’ ‘high-risk’ test devices
- House GOP balks on young immigrants bill
- CEO shot, wounded in Chicago, apparently by demoted executive
- Credit-card-stealing virus ‘Backoff’ virtually undetectable, Homeland Security warns
- Museum sleepover for adults sells out
- State Dept: ‘No American is proud’ of CIA tactics
- Rollout of health exchange draws flak from GAO official
- House’s vote to sue Obama is historic foray into checks, balances