White House, Congress increasingly at odds over Defense spending bill
WASHINGTON — The White House is escalating an election-year dispute with Congress over military spending as lawmakers bucked the Pentagon and spared favorite ships and aircraft despite diminishing budgets.
One day after a veto threat, Chief of Staff Denis McDonough met privately with House Democrats on Tuesday and criticized the $601 billion Defense authorization bill for parochial changes as the Defense Department deals with smaller budgets. Projected Defense spending has been reduced after a decade of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as congressional deficit hawks demand less federal spending.
The House began three days of debate on Tuesday on the policy bill that saves the A-10 Warthog aircraft, which provides close air support, steers millions to refuel an aircraft carrier and upgrades tanks while rejecting Pentagon pleas to close unnecessary military bases and increase out-of-pocket costs for housing and health care for personnel and their families.
“Denis said, ‘If there's no bill, that's fine. We can live with that,' ”Rep. John Yarmuth, D-Ky., told reporters as he emerged from the closed-door meeting.
Congress has passed the bill that authorizes spending and sets policy for 52 consecutive years as it remains one of the most popular, bipartisan measures. A separate spending bill provides the money for the Defense Department, and the military could operate with that alone.
On Monday, the White House complained that the House bill increases “the risk to the department's ability to implement the president's Defense strategy, contributing to a military that will be less capable of responding effectively to future challenges. In addition, the bill's continuation of unwarranted restrictions regarding detainees held at the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, undermines our national security.”
Pentagon officials have been vocal in their criticism of Congress, warning that the changes would reduce the money available to train men and women to fight wars.
“Readiness has no constituents. You know what I mean?” Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at the Atlantic Council recently. “Weapons systems have constituents, bases have constituents, but readiness has no constituents, except those who have to apply the military instrument when the time comes.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- Shutdown looms as House rejects Homeland Security funding
- 8 shot to death, including gunman, in Missouri rampage
- Foreign government gifts to family charity present candidacy hurdle for Hillary Clinton
- Republicans try to jump-start food stamp reforms
- Russian threat via cyber on the rise, says U.S. intelligence assessment
- Heavy snow cuts power, snarls travel across South
- In a twist, fight for medical marijuana goes to Florida Statehouse
- Storm dumps more snow in Colorado
- Obama defies GOP, vetoes Keystone
- Feds lack evidence to prosecute Zimmerman in Fla. teen’s shooting death
- California commuter train hits pickup at crossing, derails, injuring 28