White House, Congress increasingly at odds over Defense spending bill
WASHINGTON — The White House is escalating an election-year dispute with Congress over military spending as lawmakers bucked the Pentagon and spared favorite ships and aircraft despite diminishing budgets.
One day after a veto threat, Chief of Staff Denis McDonough met privately with House Democrats on Tuesday and criticized the $601 billion Defense authorization bill for parochial changes as the Defense Department deals with smaller budgets. Projected Defense spending has been reduced after a decade of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as congressional deficit hawks demand less federal spending.
The House began three days of debate on Tuesday on the policy bill that saves the A-10 Warthog aircraft, which provides close air support, steers millions to refuel an aircraft carrier and upgrades tanks while rejecting Pentagon pleas to close unnecessary military bases and increase out-of-pocket costs for housing and health care for personnel and their families.
“Denis said, ‘If there's no bill, that's fine. We can live with that,' ”Rep. John Yarmuth, D-Ky., told reporters as he emerged from the closed-door meeting.
Congress has passed the bill that authorizes spending and sets policy for 52 consecutive years as it remains one of the most popular, bipartisan measures. A separate spending bill provides the money for the Defense Department, and the military could operate with that alone.
On Monday, the White House complained that the House bill increases “the risk to the department's ability to implement the president's Defense strategy, contributing to a military that will be less capable of responding effectively to future challenges. In addition, the bill's continuation of unwarranted restrictions regarding detainees held at the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, undermines our national security.”
Pentagon officials have been vocal in their criticism of Congress, warning that the changes would reduce the money available to train men and women to fight wars.
“Readiness has no constituents. You know what I mean?” Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at the Atlantic Council recently. “Weapons systems have constituents, bases have constituents, but readiness has no constituents, except those who have to apply the military instrument when the time comes.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- Boston police officer improving after surgery to remove bullet near ear
- Despite high gas costs, Northeast resistant to pipelines
- Doctors push end-of-life care talks
- 2 bodies found at site of gas explosion in NYC apartments
- Drownings in Rio Grande spike as enforcement surges
- Pence: ‘Not going to change’ religious freedom law
- Before leak, NSA mulled ending phone program
- Mining for tourists? A dubious economic savior in Appalachia
- Global warming is slowing down the circulation of the oceans — with potentially dire consequences
- Gun used by agent who helped jail Capone headed to museum
- Homeland Security official improperly helped foreign investors in visa cases, inspector general says