Pentagon considers enlistment of 'Dreamers'
WASHINGTON — The Pentagon is weighing allowing some immigrants brought illegally to the country as youths, known as “Dreamers,” to serve in the military, a unilateral step by the Obama administration as immigration legislation remains stalled in the Republican-led House.
The announcement was made on Tuesday as House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, defended his election-year decision to rebuff a narrow immigration measure pushed by a GOP congressman to achieve a similar goal.
The Pentagon consideration would apply to immigrants who arrived illegally as children but have received work permits and relief from deportation under a program President Obama announced two years ago, called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA. More than 500,000 immigrants have benefited from the program.
The developments provided further evidence of the slim chances of House action, as Boehner moved to shut down the likeliest area of compromise on the contentious issue.
Boehner told reporters that a Defense bill was not the place for a vote on California Rep. Jeff Denham's measure offering citizenship to immigrants here illegally who serve.
“We have supported it in the past but trying to do this on the national Defense authorization bill seems to us be an inappropriate place to do it,” Boehner said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Railroad measure awaits House approval
- Lawmakers press Veterans Affairs for improved access to rural health care
- Tribune-Review poll: Cable news rises as network news falls
- Carnegie Mellon expert to school Congress on security
- Natural gas royalties lawsuit hinges on transaction date
- Inhofe reverses on transporation bill
- White House won’t snub pro-Israel lobby
- Buffet: Berkshire’s built to last
- Deadly bacteria release spurs concern at Louisiana lab
- Nurse who survived Ebola virus says Dallas hospital failed her
- Dems keep blocking joint negotiations on immigration orders