Armed forces color guard's participation in gay pride parade may be a 1st
WASHINGTON — Shortly after Dykes on Bikes rumble across the starting line of the Capital Pride parade in downtown Washington on Saturday, an expected 150,000 spectators should witness something never before seen on an American city street — an armed forces color guard marching alongside rainbow flags in a gay pride parade.
The Department of Defense has authorized what military gay rights groups and organizers of the Capital Pride parade say is a first nationally: a color guard that will present the red, white and blue as well as flags of each branch of the military.
The eight-member team is scheduled to help lead off the 11⁄2-mile parade, immediately preceding the Capital Pride lead banner and grand marshal Chris Kluwe, the former NFL punter and author of the book “Beautifully Unique Sparkleponies.”
While no policy has precluded an armed forces color guard from participating in gay rights events since the 2011 repeal of “Don't Ask Don't Tell,” gay rights organizations from Washington to Hawaii say they have been rejected routinely by local military offices, saying the color guards were otherwise occupied on the days of pride parades.
Lt. Cmdr. Nate Christensen, a Department of Defense spokesman, said he could not confirm whether Saturday's event was a first because decisions about military support for parades are generally made at the local level. Christensen said an armed forces color guard performed on the grounds of the Pentagon last year for a Department of Defense pride event.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- CIA admits Senate was spied on
- Museum sleepover for adults sells out
- CEO shot, wounded in Chicago, apparently by demoted executive
- Georgia company CEO, 2 others slated to go on trial in salmonella outbreak
- N.Y. opera proposes mediation as lockout looms
- IRS calls right-wing Republicans ‘crazies’ in emails
- House’s vote to sue Obama is historic foray into checks, balances
- State Dept: ‘No American is proud’ of CIA tactics
- Congress considers dangers of driving high
- Credit-card-stealing virus ‘Backoff’ virtually undetectable, Homeland Security warns
- FDA will regulate labs’ ‘high-risk’ test devices