Younger diners tip less, poll finds
The generation that lives to eat does not live to tip.
Millennials — younger adults roughly ages 18 to 34 — often leave tips way below the national average, according to a new Harris Poll online survey that was crunched for global restaurant reviewer Michelin Maps and Guides.
About one in three Millennials admit they usually tip less than 15 percent when dining out, according to the national survey of 2,019 adults conducted in December 2013.
That makes Millennials about twice as likely as adults 35 and up to be lousy tippers. Only 16 percent of adults in the older age group tip less than 15 percent.
But when it comes to splurging for restaurant meals, these same Millennials are willing to spend way more than any other age group. When asked what they'd be willing to spend on a once-in-a-lifetime meal experience (food and drink) at a famous, gourmet restaurant, Millennials said they'd be willing to shell out an average $213. That compares with the $123 that folks 65 and older said they'd be willing to pay.
Why are Millennials such big spenders on food but cheapsters on tips?
“They're simply not aware of the norms that most older adults are aware of,” says Tony Fouladpour, a spokesman for Michelin Maps and Guides. “Let's just say, they lack the experience.”
Of course they also typically lack the disposable income of older adults, he adds, and the economic and employment pictures come into play.
“This is an age group that's having difficulty finding work in their professions,” Fouladpour notes.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Worries mount of unleashed ‘Taliban 5’
- Defense chief says U.S. can fly over South China Sea
- Cleanup begins from deadly flooding in Texas amid continuing rain
- IRS believes identity thieves are from Russia
- Lawyer argues in New York court that chimpanzees have same rights as humans
- Administration finalizes, defends broader regulations under Clean Water Act
- Dems tell DHS to end family detention
- FCC clears technology use to block robocalls
- Army lab sent at least 1 live batch of anthrax
- Fossils point to relative of ‘Lucy’ species
- Nebraska lawmakers ban death penalty