BP to fly first commercial drone flight over U.S. land
The Federal Aviation Administration announced on Tuesday that permission for the first commercial drone to fly over U.S. land has gone to oil company BP and drone manufacturer AeroVironment to fly aerial surveys over Alaska's North Slope.
AeroVironment flew a Puma AE drone on its first commercial flight on Sunday to survey BP pipelines, roads and equipment at Prudhoe Bay, the nation's largest oil field, the FAA said.
Using the Puma's sensors, BP hopes to target maintenance activities in an effort to save time, improve safety and increase reliability in the sensitive North Slope environment, according to the FAA.
“These surveys on Alaska's North Slope are another important step toward broader commercial use of unmanned aircraft,” said Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx, who oversees the FAA.
The announcement occurs as the drone industry urges faster FAA approval of commercial drones for jobs that are too dangerous or boring for people to fly conventional aircraft.
Brendan Schulman, a New York lawyer specializing in drones at Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, said the permission was granted for a drone approved by the Defense Department for military purposes, so the decision wouldn't allow for the variety of commercial purposes that many in the industry have in mind.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Social Security’s $300M IT project doesn’t work
- Man told transit police the Boston Marathon bomber ‘was my best friend’
- Fire season expected to accelerate
- Massachusetts teen held in teacher’s slaying accused assaulting detention center worker
- Mont. senator’s thesis appears to have been plagarized
- Biden decries voting restrictions in NAACP address
- Obamacare enrollees strain Medicaid in Oregon
- Mountaineer workers fear smoking ban will harm ‘livelihood’
- Ariz. inmate’s execution apparently botched
- Can Georgia GOP ‘outsider’ Perdue best Democrats’ Nunn?
- Head of troubled CDC anthrax lab quits