Lack of tougher checks vexes Obama
WASHINGTON — The failure to win tougher background checks for gun purchases or other new firearms regulations are the “biggest frustration” of his term in office, President Obama said as he decried school shootings that are “becoming the norm” in ways that “as a parent, are terrifying to me.”
Answering questions on the social media site Tumblr, Obama said that gun violence in America is “off the charts” and that “we should be ashamed” of its prevalence.
He brushed aside the argument made by some opponents of gun regulations that mental illness, not guns, lies at the root of recent shootings.
“The United States does not have a monopoly on crazy people,” Obama said. Yet “we're the only developed country” that suffers repeated mass shootings.
The school shooting in Oregon is at least the 74th instance of shots being fired on school grounds or in school buildings since the late-2012 elementary school shooting in Newtown, Conn., according to a list maintained by the group Everytown for Gun Safety, which advocates for policies it believes limit gun violence.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Despite U.S. dollars and bombs, effort failing to squash ISIS
- Blankenship’s attorneys want mine blast evidence out of trial
- Dusty Atlantic Ocean thwarts tropical storms
- Suspect in South Carolina church shooting wants to plead guilty to hate crimes, attorney says
- Clintons hauled in $139M in past 8 years
- San Francisco’s Chinatown clings to roots amid tech boom
- Hope dims for Fla. teens lost at sea
- Fetal parts in Planned Parenthood lab shown in 4th video
- Global lion population falling primarily because of loss of habitat, experts say
- Analysts expect French laboratory will be able to provide details from examination of jet part
- Fires’ fury unabated in California