2-star general to probe Bergdahl's capture
WASHINGTON — The military has appointed a two-star general to investigate the circumstances under which Bowe Bergdahl, the soldier recently freed after five years in Taliban captivity, disappeared in eastern Afghanistan in 2009, an official said on Sunday.
A Defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the general had been appointed to conduct the army investigation of Sgt. Bergdahl's June 2009 disappearance and capture but said the probe had not yet begun.
The official declined to name the general.
Bergdahl, who was released on May 31 in a prisoner exchange with the Taliban, arrived at a military hospital in Texas on Friday.
While the release of Bergdahl, who had been the only U.S. prisoner of war, was widely hailed initially, it has attracted widespread criticism, in part from lawmakers who say the five senior Taliban figures freed from the Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for Bergdahl could return to the fight.
Lawmakers have complained that the Obama administration failed to give Congress required 30-day notice before releasing the Taliban to Qatar.
Some of Bergdahl's former peers in Afghanistan have alleged the soldier, 28, walked away from his post voluntarily. But the Pentagon has said the circumstances of his disappearance and capture were unclear.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Colorado clinic shooting suspect talked of baby parts, police say
- Police officer killed in Colorado Spring clinic rampage a co-pastor, figure skater
- Police union stands by Chicago officer charged with murdering teen
- Slow-moving, wintry storm packs punch in Plains, Midwest
- Disability claim waits grow alongside swelling caseloads for judges
- Investors buy shares in college students: Purdue University thinks it’s wave of future
- Pot doctors in medical marijuana states push boundaries with marketing
- Federal $1.1 trillion spending bill loaded with policy deals
- Authorization for NSA dragnets of phone call data expires
- Chicago retail district targeted by protesters
- Kids making oral history with StoryCorps holiday project