| USWorld

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Trademark board rules against Redskins name

A Washington Redskins football helmet lies on the field during NFL football minicamp, Wednesday, June 18, 2014, in Ashburn, Va.

Email Newsletters

Sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Daily Photo Galleries

By The Associated Press
Wednesday, June 18, 2014, 11:33 a.m.

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Patent Office ruled Wednesday that the Washington Redskins nickname is “disparaging of Native Americans” and that the team's federal trademarks for the name must be canceled.

The 2-1 ruling comes after a campaign to change the name gained momentum over the past year. The team doesn't immediately lose trademark protection and is allowed to retain it during an appeal, which is likely.

Redskins owner Dan Snyder has refused to change the team's name, citing tradition, but there has been growing pressure including statements in recent months from President Barack Obama, lawmakers of both parties and civil rights groups.

The decision means that the team can continue to use the Redskins name, but it would lose a significant portion of its ability to protect the financial interests connected to its use. If others printed the name on sweatshirts, apparel, or other team material, it becomes more difficult to go after groups who use it without permission.

The case involves six registered trademarks that involve the use of the word Redskins, but it does not apply to the team's logo.

The decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board is similar to one it issued in 1999. That ruling was overturned in 2003 in large part on a technicality after the courts decided that the plaintiffs should have filed their complaint soon after the Redskins registered their nickname in 1967.

The new case was launched in 2006 by a younger group of Native Americans, and was heard by the board in March of last year.

The group argued that the Redskins should lose their federal trademark protection based on a law that prohibits registered names that are disparaging, scandalous, contemptuous or disreputable.

Suzan Shown Harjo, one of the plaintiffs who testified at last year's hearing, said she was “thrilled and delighted” with the decision. Snyder declined to speak to reporters as he walked off the practice field, but the team said it planned to release a statement later in the day.

In Washington, lawmakers who have pushed for a name change applauded the decision. In May, half of the Senate wrote letters to the NFL urging the team to change its name.

“Daniel Snyder may be the last person in the world to realize this, but it's just a matter of time until he is forced to do the right thing and change the name,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who has said previously he will not attend home games until the team changes its name.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. ‘Crisis mode’ near at U.S.-Mexico line as nearly 5,000 children try to cross border in October
  2. Obama signs $607B Defense bill but blasts GOP limits for Gitmo
  3. Obama: No credible intelligence about terror plot against US
  4. Peanut glut poses hefty bailout tab for taxpayers
  5. Los Angeles-based water agency’s land buy rattles California farmers
  6. New Hampshire cancer patient gets permission to travel to Maine for medical pot
  7. Self-driving vehicles closer to getting green light as feds ease stance
  8. Foreign policy expert: Obama administration should create Syria safe areas
  9. Barrier nears completion in Indiana marsh to keep Asian carp from Great Lakes
  10. Girls outperform boys in variety of subjects, international survey shows
  11. Feds tell railroads they must meet deadlines for lifesaving technology