CDC study says asthma might be on decline
NEW YORK — A new survey suggests asthma might finally be on the decline. But the results are so surprising that health officials are cautious.
“I wouldn't say it's good news — yet,” said the study's lead author, Jeannine Schiller of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The findings come from a large national health survey conducted last year. The drop could just be an unexplained statistical blip, and Schiller said she's waiting for data from this year before proclaiming asthma is on the decline.
The CDC released the report on Thursday.
For the past several years, about 8.6 percent of Americans have said they have asthma. But in the 2013 survey, 7.4 percent said they have it. That was the lowest mark in a decade, and represents a decline of more than 3 million people.
The largest declines were seen in black children and women.
There was also a drop in those who said they'd had an asthma attack or episode in the past year. The number fell from 4.4 percent in 2012 to 3.8 percent last year — the lowest mark in more than 15 years.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Cantor to leave House early
- CIA chief’s job could be at risk over Senate probe
- Law enforcement, intelligence agencies want to ‘like’ you on social media
- Lawmakers say answering Census survey should be voluntary
- Rollout of health exchange draws flak from GAO official
- House’s vote to sue Obama is historic foray into checks, balances
- N.Y. opera proposes mediation as lockout looms
- CIA admits Senate was spied on
- Witnesses added for Benghazi hearing
- Congress considers dangers of driving high
- Credit-card-stealing virus ‘Backoff’ virtually undetectable, Homeland Security warns