IRS loss of emails believed avoidable
It's “possible” the IRS could have lost top executives' old emails, a leading computer storage expert told the Tribune-Review.
“But to do so requires an incompetent IT staff and ignorance of federal law in this case,” said Ethan Miller, an electronic archival expert at the University of California, Santa Cruz.
Internal Revenue Service Commissioner John Koskinen can expect to get questions over the agency's email storage priorities when he testifies before Congress on Friday.
The tax agency has told Congress it cannot produce emails written by Lois Lerner, a retired administrator, and six other top officials involved in a controversy over whether conservative Tea Party groups received extra scrutiny when they sought nonprofit status.
The IRS said it told employees to save old messages on their individual computers, and that Lerner lost the messages when her computer hard drive failed.
Federal regulations require agencies to preserve emails that include substantive information about policies and activities so “records can be readily found when needed.”
Beyond that, the National Archives says systems should be designed to “ensure the security and integrity” of electronic records. It specifically cautions that electronic records should not be maintained solely on one staff member's computer hard disk.
“Poor documentation may result in an unresponsive government or a government that cannot account for its actions,” the archive says.
Each organization's policy for saving emails depends on whether it expects to need old information — and how much it is willing to pay, said Tom Cullen, director of computing facilities at Carnegie Mellon University's School of Computer Science.
Researchers at the school want to be able to access decades-old emails, so the school saves every message, backing them on tapes that are stored in an off-campus site, he said. The university was able to prove CMU researcher Scott Fahlman invented emoticons because it has the original message he sent in 1982.
“Every organization has different needs,” Cullen said. “Within the organization, its culture and its policies really drive how long the data would be retained and treated.”
Law firms and financial institutions tend to save every message, regardless of cost, because clients and regulators demand retention, experts said. Small nonprofits, meanwhile, might regularly delete messages after a few months.
Government agencies, such as the IRS, tend to receive mandates from lawmakers and regulators that can be hard and expensive to follow, especially amid budget cuts, said Garth Gibson, a computer information expert at Carnegie Mellon.
The risk of losing old emails might not be as great, either, he said.
“If you are a lawyer or you are a bank, then the government can take you to court and take a lot of money away from you if you lose things you're supposed to keep,” Gibson said. “But I don't know who would take the IRS to court and extract money.”
The IRS estimated it would cost more than $10 million to save every email sent and received by its 90,000 employees. Last year, the agency started saving storage tapes with a daily snapshot of all emails, at an annual cost of about $200,000.
The agency's total spending budget is about $12 billion a year.
Outgoing White House spokesman Jay Carney this week told reporters that the agency tried to recover the lost emails. “IT professionals worked to restore Lerner's hard drive, but were unable to do so,” he said.
Experts agreed that saving old messages can be costly and cumbersome, especially when users rarely go back to them. But for key executives, Miller said the agency could have done something as simple as buying each one an external hard drive for less than $200 and asking them to back up information regularly.
“If they were using standard tools it would have been easy for them to do the right thing,” Miller said. “The question is, ‘How important for your business practices is it to not lose the data?' ”
Andrew Conte is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7835 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Andrew Conte to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Chinese hack defense contractors
- FBI, federal marshals join manhunt for survivalist accused of ambushing troopers
- Study ties middle-age migraines, Parkinson’s
- Artificial sweeteners possible contributors to diabetes, obesity
- Glitch in health care law calculator enables employers to offer substandard health care coverage
- Dog gone for 4 months found 3,000 miles from home
- 2 orbiters about to arrive at Mars to hunt for clues to climate change
- S.C. man believed kids were going to kill him, warrant says
- Again, Arizona looks to plentiful rain
- House panel OKs move to split Amtrak, focus on profitable Northeast Corridor
- Damage assessed from wildfire in Weed, Calif.