CIA envisions, kills 'devil' bin Laden doll
The CIA once considered a 12-inch, red-faced, devil-eyed action figure of Osama bin Laden to spook American families into hating the al-Qaida leader. But the government-contracted demon doll never made it to store shelves.
The Washington Post reports that in 2005 — while bin Laden remained the most wanted man in the world — the CIA developed three prototypes of the doll featuring faces painted with a heat-dissolving material designed to peel off and reveal a red face with piercing green eyes and black facial markings.
The code-name for the bin Laden figures was “Devil Eyes.” The project was discontinued in 2006 after the prototypes were developed, the Post reports.
“To our knowledge, there were only three individual action figures ever created, and these were merely to show what a final product might look like,” CIA spokesman Ryan Trapani said. “After being presented with these examples, the CIA declined to pursue this idea and did not produce or distribute any of these action figures. Furthermore, CIA has no knowledge of these action figures being produced or distributed by others.”
Donald Levine, the former Hasbro executive who was part of the creation of G.I. Joe toys, worked with the CIA to develop the prototype, the Post reports, citing an unnamed official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the official wasn't authorized to discuss the project publicly.
Bin Laden's head was superimposed on a figurine that was already in production, and the final prototype was dressed in traditional garb and packaged in a cheap box covered with plastic, the Post says. The Post reports that Levine apparently was pleased with the final bin Laden product, but the CIA declined to pursue production.
A U.S. special forces unit killed bin Laden on May 2, 2011, in a raid in Pakistan.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Dusty Atlantic Ocean thwarts tropical storms
- Clintons hauled in $139M in past 8 years
- El Niño helps, harms economies
- Global lion population falling primarily because of loss of habitat, experts say
- Oklahoma earthquakes shut down wells
- San Francisco’s Chinatown clings to roots amid tech boom
- In dispute over coal mine project, two ways of life hang in the balance
- Georgia school returns Cosby’s money
- Republicans seek firing of IRS chief in feud over missing emails
- Hope dims for Fla. teens lost at sea
- Defense memo reveals plan to protect transgender troops