Senate panel OKs pay freeze for Congress
WASHINGTON — A Senate panel voted on Thursday to follow the House and deny lawmakers the cost-of-living pay raise they would otherwise automatically receive in January.
The move by the Appropriations Committee would freeze congressional salaries at $174,000 a year and is attached to legislation to fund Congress' budget, which passed the panel by voice vote. Lawmakers haven't received a pay hike since January 2009.
Bipartisan reforms enacted in 1989 gave lawmakers a big pay increase in exchange for dropping the much-criticized practice of accepting money from outside interest groups for speeches.
That legislation awarded lawmakers annual cost-of-living pay increases, but lawmakers have often opted to deny themselves the pay hikes.
The House passed the pay freeze last month.
Congress accepted the annual COLA for some years in the 1990s and for most of the 2000s but has voted to deny itself the raise for five consecutive years.
The scheduled 1.6 percent hike would have given lawmakers a raise of about $2,800 in January.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Chicago police videos of black teen McDonald’s death lack sounds; protests planned for ‘Black Friday’
- Hawaii confronts dengue fever cases
- White House fence jumper captured on lawn
- Prescription skin drug costs skyrocket
- Former police officer who was indicted found dead in Massachusetts home
- Registration of drone operators pushed by aviation industry
- Democrats face long odds in battle for lost congressional seats
- Washington project ensures long-term carbon storage
- Sex offender checks in with stolen boarding pass, authorities say
- EPA works on algae rules to protect from toxins found in lakes, rivers
- New Hampshire cancer patient gets permission to travel to Maine for medical pot