Courts fight heroin scourge with opiate-blocking drug injections
LEBANON, Ohio — The twice-arrested heroin user listened nervously as the judge reviewed her record, then offered a deal he thinks could save her life.
“You're not a criminal, you're an addict,” Judge Robert Peeler told Cynthia Fugate. “Something is driving you to use heroin that is beyond your control. Is that fair to say?”
“Yes, sir,” she replied quietly.
Peeler, a common pleas court judge in southwest Ohio's Warren County, is among a growing number of judges and corrections officials across the country trying to combat the fast-growing national heroin problem by fighting heroin needles with treatment needles. Peeler told Fugate he could order monthly injections of the opiate-blocking drug Vivitrol if she were willing.
“I'm 30 years old. I've overdosed four times,” Fugate said, her voice quavering. “I want to be clean. I really do.”
The shots, the judge said, could keep Fugate from “winding up in a body bag.”
Peeler began researching the drug treatment shots last year after a young woman died of a heroin overdose, at least the third heroin user who had stood before him in his courtroom who later died. Nationally, overdose deaths have risen 45 percent from 2006 to 2010. In Ohio, 680 people died of heroin overdoses in 2012, up 60 percent from the previous year.
Vivitrol has its skeptics, with some questioning whether it's effective enough to warrant the time and expense — shots can cost about $1,000 each — and suggesting it's a trendy, under-researched attempt at a quick fix. Sheriff Richard Jones in neighboring Butler County has called Vivitrol in jails “a waste of money,” citing an earlier pilot program in Warren County in which only three of 12 subjects completed the program and stayed off drugs.
Peeler is among those who say the high toll of heroin-related deaths, crime and prison recidivism make it worth trying.
“To sit back and keep doing what we've been doing just isn't going to get it,” Peeler said. “I want to stop people from dying.”
The Warren County program is getting about $800,000 in state funding help for Vivitrol, and programs are under way in dozens of other courts, jails and prisons in at least 21 states, from Cape Cod in Massachusetts to Lane County in Oregon. The programs are usually funded with grants, getting some help from drugmaker donations and discounts, and insurance usually will cover some shots.
Vivitrol, made by Alkermes PLC of Ireland, had been used for alcoholism. But a Russian study showed it could be effective for users of heroin, morphine and other opiate drugs with once-monthly injections.It was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in late 2010.
Vivitrol uses naltrexone, an opioid receptor antagonist, to block heroin's effects on the brain. Unlike the widely used methadone treatment, it doesn't require clinic visits and daily doses and is unlikely to lead to trading one dependency for another, as can happen with other treatments, advocates say. Effective for a month, it eases the daily temptation of people struggling to stay off heroin.
Because Vivitrol is long-lasting, it has special importance for former heroin users leaving incarceration, said Mady Chalk, a former federal official on substance abuse who is now with Philadelphia's Treatment Research Institute.
“Patients return to their community having been detoxed, their systems have been emptied of the drugs; they return to environments that trigger all the things that one would expect,” Chalk said. Many are unable to resist the urge to reuse heroin and don't realize they can't tolerate as strong a dose as before.
“The body simply can't handle it, and they die,” Chalk said.
Giving users an injection before they leave custody provides a month's buffer to begin post-release counseling and to focus on rebuilding their lives.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Analysis: Republican budget plan out of line with political reality
- EPA sets levels to alert public about water
- Global C02 levels pass ‘disturbing’ threshold
- Jeni’s traces listeria sourc to Ohio plant
- Number of insured has risen 17 million since expansion
- Official tells legislators that Clinton erred
- 1,600 at IRS evade taxes, says watchdog
- U.S. ends use of warships in gulf strait
- Immigration provision could derail defense bill
- Wide-scale review of VA backed
- Military whistle-blowers’ retaliation claims languish at Pentagon, GAO finds