Pop goes NYC's ban on giant sodas — for now, anyway
NEW YORK — Big sodas can stay on the menu in the Big Apple because New York state's top court refused on Thursday to reinstate the city's first-of-its-kind size limit on sugary drinks. But city officials suggested they might be willing to revisit the supersize-soda ban.
The Court of Appeals found that the city's board of health overstepped its bounds by imposing a 16-ounce cap on sugary beverages sold in restaurants, delis, movie theaters, stadiums and street carts. The appointed board tread on the policymaking turf of the elected City Council, the court said.
“By choosing among competing policy goals, without any legislative delegation or guidance, the board engaged in lawmaking,” the court wrote in a majority opinion. “... Its choices raise difficult, intricate and controversial issues of social policy.”
Indeed, debate over the soda size cap pitted health officials who called it an innovative anti-obesity tool against critics who considered it unfair to businesses and paternalistic toward consumers. Even a Court of Appeals judge, during arguments earlier this month, wondered aloud whether regulators would target triple-decker burgers next.
The American Beverage Association, which led the fight against the measure, welcomed the ruling. It said the measure would have “limited New Yorkers' freedom of choice.” Curbing obesity should start “with education — not laws and regulation,” spokesman Christopher Gindlesperger said.
But city leaders signaled they might not give up the fight. Mayor Bill de Blasio said the city was “actively reviewing all of its options to protect the health and well-being of our communities”; officials wouldn't immediately specify what those might be. The city hasn't said whether it plans to try to appeal, but the case doesn't raise federal issues that would make it a likely choice for the Supreme Court.
City Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito said in a statement that the big-soda ban would get a hearing if it were brought up in the council. It's unclear how any such measure might fare in a vote because she and numerous other council members oppose it.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- Homeland Security panned for passing on bio-threat technology
- Supreme Court’s health care law ruling worries 34 states
- Huge, ancient quasar could alter theories on black holes
- Perceived slights have some New Yorkers longing for Pennsylvania
- Monarch butterflies find milkweed supply dwindles
- Most young Republicans back legal marijuana
- Paul edges Walker in CPAC straw poll
- Buffet: Berkshire’s built to last
- Florida fisherman’s high court win spurs call for legal reform
- Gene making human brains bigger found
- Mo. gunman kills 7, self, in rampage