UCLA says $300,000 speaking fee paid Hillary Clinton came from private endowment
Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton was paid $300,000 to speak to students and faculty at the University of California at Los Angeles in March, the university said on Friday.
UCLA spokesman Jean-Paul Renaud said Clinton's fee was paid through a private endowment established for a lecture series by Meyer Luskin, an investor and president of Scope Industries, a food waste recycling company.
In 2012, former President Bill Clinton was paid $250,000 to deliver the inaugural address in the Luskin lecture series, Renaud said.
In both instances, Renaud said, the fees went to the Clintons' charitable group, now called the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation.
UCLA is a public university, but Renaud said the fees “came from private money. No public funds were used for it — no tuition dollars, no state funds.” News of Hillary Clinton's UCLA payment, first reported by the Wall Street Journal, arrives amid growing scrutiny of Clinton's personal wealth and speaking fees.
Clinton is being paid $225,000 to speak at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas. Although her office said she is directing the funds to the Clinton Foundation, her pay has drawn protests from student leaders. Jon Ralston, an influential television journalist in Nevada, called Clinton's fee “grotesque” and “obscene.”
A spokesman for Clinton did not respond to a request for comment.
On Friday, The Washington Post published a comprehensive review of Bill Clinton's paid speeches. He has earned $104.9 million delivering 542 speeches around the world from the time he left the White House in January 2001 until Hillary Clinton's departure as secretary of state in January 2013, the Post review found.
Most of the money — $56.3 million — came from speeches that Clinton delivered to companies and groups overseas, according to the review.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- CD weaves Elvis classics with Royal Philharmonic
- Brown’s shooting makes ex-Ferguson cop ‘unemployable,’ he tells magazine
- 3 Senate Dems throw weight behind Iran deal
- 5th video of Planned Parenthood released
- Mexican cilantro linked to illnesses
- Wildfires threaten Forest Service budget
- FBI probes Clinton’s private email setup
- Pickup driver who opened fire near Camp Shelby sought; no injuries reported
- Why circus went on with bad storms in the area under investigation
- Family of woman found dead in Texas jail files wrongful death suit
- ATF says gunman not part of Fast and Furious sting