Baby left on NYC subway platform, police say
NEW YORK — Security video showed nothing amiss when Frankea Dabbs — wearing dark glasses, pushing a baby stroller and pulling a rolling suitcase — entered a busy Manhattan subway station on Monday night.
But after riding uptown to another stop, police say Dabbs purposely left her most precious possession behind on the subway platform: a baby girl.
Dabbs, 20, who has a record of petty crimes in North Carolina, was arrested near Central Park on abandonment charges on Tuesday when someone recognized her from the video released by police.
Dabbs described herself to detectives as a homeless widow who arrived in New York on July 2, said Stephen Davis, spokesman for the New York Police Department.
“She felt she couldn't take care of the baby and thought she was leaving her in a safe public space,” Davis said.
A passenger had seen the woman and child board the train at 42nd Street and Seventh Avenue, police said. The passenger got off at Columbus Circle and noticed the unattended stroller on the platform and the mother inside the train. The passenger remained with the baby for about 20 minutes, and when the mother did not return, she notified a subway worker who called police.
The baby, who is about 10 months, was examined at Roosevelt Hospital, and doctors found no apparent signs of trauma, police said. She was placed in the care of the city's Administration for Children's Services.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Nurse defies Maine quarantine in standoff over Ebola
- Terminally ill woman may delay planned Nov. 1 suicide
- Museum saves part of bomber plant
- Botched probe of suspected arms dealer echoed Fast and Furious, watchdog finds
- Hawaii’s National Guard sent to lava flow site
- Inmate freed in landmark case
- Ferguson grand jury cleared in leaks about police shooting of black teenager
- Democratic areas flush with transportation grants
- D.C. closer to legalizing sale of pot
- Wash. shooting survivor has jaw surgery
- Gray wolf sighting reported at Grand Canyon