Private groups call for armed volunteers to patrol U.S.-Mexico border
DALLAS — Citizen groups in border states are seeking armed volunteers to patrol the U.S.-Mexico frontier alongside law enforcement officers who are struggling to deal with a surge of undocumented migrants from Central America.
Southwestern states have had a flood of arrivals this year, putting a strain on the Customs and Border Protection agency.
Anti-illegal immigration groups have turned to social media, blogs and 24-hour hotlines in the hope of recruiting thousands of volunteers to help out.
But federal authorities have made it clear they do not support any private group taking matters into its own hands, saying that could have “disastrous” consequences.
The activists maintain that their efforts are needed because the federal government has failed to secure the border.
In a Web posting on Thursday, The Minuteman Project, led by former Marine Jim Gilchrist, said it will take 10 months to organize the start of Operation Normandy.
The group said it expected to attract 3,500 armed citizen volunteers to cover sections of the 2,000-mile border from San Diego, Calif., via Arizona and New Mexico to Brownsville, Texas.
Unlike the Normandy invasion of France in 1944, Gilchrist said, the group's members will not leave home soil.
“We are not going to the border to invade anyone. We are going there to stop an invasion,” he wrote online.
Meanwhile, another group whose members are known as “Patriots” is organizing military-style operations and appealing for donations of gear, including night-vision equipment, via the website PatriotsInformationHotline.com.
According to the site, the group has four operations deployed along the border in Texas and three on the ground in Arizona.
“We need to save America. Look to the future. Step up NOW!!” reads one call to action on the website.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Physicians’ organization cites shortages of doctors will grow, mostly in senior care
- Mother of 12-year-old shot dead by police criticizes Cleveland for faulting son, failing to apologize
- Case on Obamacare tax subsidies heads to Supreme Court
- Tsarnaev’s lawyer admits he carried out Boston bombing
- Obama promises to veto Republican vote to reverse NLRB rule on unions
- Lawmakers press Veterans Affairs for improved access to rural health care
- Carnegie Mellon expert to school Congress on security
- GOP admits defeat as Congress approves Homeland funding
- Petraeus, Justice Department reach plea deal on secret info given to mistress
- Feds find sweeping racial bias in Ferguson
- Idaho lawmakers object to Hindu prayer