Passenger jet makes emergency landing on Midway
A United Airlines jet traveling from Honolulu to Guam was forced to land on the remote island of Midway because of a mechanical problem.
The airline on Friday flew the 335 passengers and 13 crew members from Flight 201 back to Honolulu. It put Guam-bound passengers on another flight to the American territory, according to the airline.
The Boeing 777 was forced to divert to Midway on Thursday as it headed to Guam. Replacement aircraft brought passengers back to Honolulu on Friday morning.
The Navy used the atoll 1,300 miles northwest of Honolulu as a base during the Cold War but left in 1996. It's a national wildlife refuge, home to more than 1 million seabirds, green sea turtles and endangered Hawaiian monk seals.
The island's residents manage the airstrip and wildlife refuge.
In another incident involving a Boeing 777, an American Airlines flight from London to Dallas-Fort Worth made an emergency landing in Tulsa on Friday night because of mechanical troubles. Flight 79 was carrying 230 passengers and a crew of 14 when it landed at Tulsa International Airport about 6:30 p.m. Friday. The crew reported a left-engine problem.
Another aircraft was sent to pick up the passengers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Defense chief says U.S. can fly over South China Sea
- Worries mount of unleashed ‘Taliban 5’
- Growth potential remains for online gambling
- FCC clears technology use to block robocalls
- Fossils point to relative of ‘Lucy’ species
- Lawyer argues in New York court that chimpanzees have same rights as humans
- Administration finalizes, defends broader regulations under Clean Water Act
- Dems tell DHS to end family detention
- Morgan settles lawsuit with Wal-Mart over crash
- Army lab sent at least 1 live batch of anthrax
- IRS believes identity thieves are from Russia