Bergdahl returns to life of 'a normal soldier'
WASHINGTON — The formal phase of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl's transition from Taliban prisoner to soldier has ended.
Bergdahl, who was held captive in Afghanistan for five years, has been given a desk job on a military base, and the stage has been set for Army investigators to question the Idaho native about his disappearance.
In a brief statement on Monday, the Army wrote that Bergdahl has been assigned to Army North at Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston in Texas.
Bergdahl has been decompressing and recuperating from the effects of captivity since his return from a military base in Germany. Since he was handed over to American special forces in Afghanistan on May 31, he has been debriefed for any possible intelligence he might have gleaned in his time with the Taliban. Otherwise, he has been gently coaxed back into a normal routine and a normal life, physically and psychologically.
Bergdahl's exact administrative duties at Army North were not disclosed, but a Pentagon spokesman, Army Col. Steve Warren, said Bergdahl is not restricted in any way. The Army said that in his assignment to Army North he “can contribute to the mission,” which is focused on homeland defense.
“He is a normal soldier now,” Warren said.
Bergdahl's case is one of the most extraordinary of recent times — for the length of his captivity, the circumstances surrounding his capture during a combat deployment, and for the controversy triggered by the circumstances of his release.
It's not clear when investigators will question Bergdahl as part of the disappearance probe. Their findings will help determine whether the 28-year-old will be prosecuted for desertion or faces any other disciplinary action. The probe is being headed by Maj. Gen. Kenneth R. Dahl, deputy commanding general of 1st Corps at Joint Base Lewis McChord in Washington state.
Numerous other questions linger, including whether Bergdahl will collect the estimated $300,000 in back pay he has accumulated during the past five years.
A military investigation in 2009 concluded that Bergdahl walked away from his unit, having expressed misgivings about the military's role — as well as his own — in Afghanistan. He was captured by Taliban members and held by members of the Haqqani network, an insurgent group tied to the Taliban.
He was released as part of a deal in which the United States gave up five top Taliban commanders who were imprisoned in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The terms of the deal sparked a political storm in Washington.
Some former members of Bergdahl's unit have labeled him a deserter, asserting that he chose to walk away and saying that soldiers were wounded or killed while looking for him.
The Army has not ruled out disciplinary action against Bergdahl, who was promoted twice during captivity, from private first class to sergeant, as a matter of standard procedure.
At the time of his disappearance, Bergdahl was a member of 1st Battalion, 501st Infantry Regiment, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division, based at Fort Richardson, Alaska.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Computer hackers’ attack on Sony ‘merits an appropriate response,’ White House says
- Federal regulators pen rules for Cuba trade, tourism
- Meningitis suspects to be freed from jail while awaiting trial in 64 deaths
- Feds design college ratings system
- Car plows into crowd in California, killing 3
- Federal group will aim to instill police-public trust
- Death penalty sought for white supremacist in Mo. killings
- Obama, now unbridled, quickly checking off to-do list
- Traffic camera use upheld in Ohio
- Federal injunction stops Arizona from enforcing policy of denying driver’s licenses to young immigrants
- Panel review says Secret Service ‘starved for leadership’