Share This Page

HGH use on the rise in teens, survey finds

| Tuesday, July 22, 2014, 8:03 p.m.
ADVANCE FOR RELEASE JULY 23, 2014, AT 12:01 A.M. EDT. THIS STORY MAY NOT BE PUBLISHED, BROADCAST OR POSTED ONLINE BEFORE 12:01 A.M. EDT.- In this April 27, 2014 photo provided by Donald Hooton Sr., Donald Hooton Jr. addresses players at the USA Football regional football camp about the potential dangers of using performance-enhancing substances at the Houston Sports Park in Houston. Experimentation with human growth hormones by America's teens more than doubled in the last year, according to a large-scale national survey. Hooton works for the Taylor Hooton Foundation, named after his brother, Taylor, a 17-year-old high school athlete whose suicide in 2003 was blamed by his family on abuse of steroids. (AP Photo/Donald Hooton Sr.)

NEW YORK — Experimentation with human growth hormones by America's teens more than doubled in the past year as more young people looked to drugs to boost their athletic performance and improve their looks, according to a new, large-scale national survey.

In a confidential 2013 survey of 3,705 high school students, being released on Wednesday by the Partnership for Drug-Free Kids, 11 percent reported using synthetic HGH at least once — up from about 5 percent in the four preceding annual surveys. Teen use of steroids increased from 5 percent to 7 percent over the same period, the survey found.

Travis Tygart, CEO of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, depicted the numbers as alarming but not surprising, given the extensive online marketing of performance-enhancing substances and near-total lack of any drug testing for high school athletes.

“It's what you get when you combine aggressive promotion from for-profit companies with a vulnerable target — kids who want a quick fix and don't care about health risk,” Tygart said.

Nine percent of teen girls and 12 percent of boys reported trying synthetic HGH.

Steve Pasierb, president of the Partnership for Drug-Free Kids, said the motives of youthful dopers were different from the rebellious or escapist attitudes that traditionally accompanied teen drinking and pot smoking.

“This is about how you feel, how you look,” Pasierb said. “They're doing this thing to get ahead. ... Girls want to be thin and toned. For a lot of boys, it's about their six-pack.”

He urged parents to talk candidly with their children about the dangers of performance-enhancing substances, but to avoid moralizing.

“It's not about illegality, or whether you're a good parent or bad parent,” he said. “It's a health issue. These substances literally alter your body.”

Pasierb said high school coaches have a key role in combatting doping. Some are vigilant, others oblivious, and perhaps a third are prepared to tolerate doping in the interests of winning, he said.

Among the groups seeking to reverse the teen doping trend is the Texas-based Taylor Hooton Foundation, named after a 17-year-old high school athlete whose suicide in 2003 was blamed by his family on his use of anabolic steroids. Its staff has spoken to thousands of young people at school assemblies and sports camps.

Donald Hooton Sr., Taylor's father and the foundation's president, depicted teen doping as an epidemic fueled by widespread ignorance among parents and coaches. He estimated that more than 1.5 million youths have tried steroids.

The survey of 3,705 students in grades 9-12 was conducted between February and June of 2013.

The margin of error was calculated at plus or minus 2.1 percentage points.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.