Share This Page

Can Georgia GOP 'outsider' Perdue best Democrats' Nunn?

| Wednesday, July 23, 2014, 6:06 p.m.
David Perdue waves to supporters after declaring victory in the Republican primary runoff for nomination to the U.S. Senate from Georgia, at his election-night party in Atlanta, Tuesday, July 22, 2014. Perdue defeated Rep. Jack Kingston. (AP Photo)
U.S. Senate candidate Michelle Nunn, D-Georgia, speaks with voters during a campaign stop at Little Kings Shuffle Club on Wednesday, July 23, 2014, in Athens, Ga. (AP Photo/Athens Banner-Herald, AJ Reynolds) MAGS OUT; MANDATORY CREDIT

David Perdue, former chief executive officer of Dollar General, squeaked by 11-term U.S. Rep. Jack Kingston to win the Republican Party's Senate primary in Georgia on Tuesday.

Perdue takes on Democrat Michelle Nunn in a November election that could test ingrained assumptions about what it takes to win big elections in the modern Bible Belt.

The faceoff between two political neophytes with well-known last names — Perdue is the cousin of former Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue, and Nunn is the daughter of Sam Nunn, the powerful former senator — is being watched as a harbinger of changing demographics in red states and the ability of Republicans to adjust to emerging voter trends. The state is experiencing minority population growth at a level to make Georgia a swing presidential state by 2020.

More immediately, if Perdue loses to Nunn in November, Republicans probably can kiss goodbye their hopes of taking majority control of the Senate. Republicans need to net an additional six seats to gain control of both houses of Congress for President Obama's final two years in office.

To win, Perdue must stave off Nunn and her backing by the so-called Bannock Street Project, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee's use of voter data and volunteers to target for turnout single women and minorities, who typically participate in midterm elections at lower rates than do older, white, Republican-skewing voters.

Without real primary competition, Nunn has been able to sit on an estimated $6 million war chest, while Perdue has had to empty most of his coffers to survive against Kingston. Perdue's personal wealth likely will enable him to keep up with Nunn, analysts say.

The basic strategy for Nunn is to paint the occasionally gaffe-prone Perdue as an out-of-touch Mitt Romney-like character.

Perdue will run the same kind of outsider campaign that helped him defeat Kingston, a congressional veteran.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.