Ariz. inmate's execution apparently botched
Officials said an Arizona inmate gasped and snorted for more than an hour until dying in an apparently botched execution on Wednesday that is sure to reinvigorate the national debate over lethal injection in the United States.
The death of Joseph Rudolph Wood III was confirmed by the Arizona attorney general to The Associated Press about two hours after the procedure began.
Wood had apparently stayed alive so long that his attorneys filed for an emergency stay after the lethal injection initially failed to kill him, according to a legal filing.
“The Arizona Department of Corrections began the execution of Joseph Rudolph Wood III at 1:52 p.m.,” said the legal filing in federal court from public defender Jon M. Sands. “At 1:57 p.m. ADC reported that Mr. Wood was sedated, but at 2:02, he began to breathe. At 2:03, his mouth moved. Mr. Wood has continued to breathe since that time. He has been gasping and snorting for more than an hour. At 3:02 p.m. At that time, staff rechecked for sedation. He is still alive.”
Sands called for Wood's execution to be halted on the grounds of cruel and unusual punishment and asked that officials try to resuscitate him.
Wood, 55, was sentenced to death in 1991 for the August 1989 shooting deaths of his estranged girlfriend, Debra Dietz, and her father, Eugene Dietz, in Tucson.
The execution had originally been set for Wednesday morning but was delayed by a temporary stay to hear arguments in a last-minute appeal effort by Wood's attorneys.
His attorneys said that his trial attorney failed to present evidence of mental illness, including brain damage, that could have spared him from a capital sentence.
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court denied a separate plea by Wood to delay his execution until the state turned over detailed information on the drugs that would be used during his execution and on the qualifications of his execution team.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Suspect in Colorado clinic attack Dear makes court appearance
- ‘Homeland’ to hair: Emails peek into Hillary Clinton’s personal life
- House may move quickly to overhaul visa waiver program
- Police shooting of black teen cited in University of Chicago threat
- Ex-speaker, once a major powerbroker, convicted in N.Y.
- New York City’s salt warning rule to take effect at chain restaurants
- Supreme Court’s election-year lineup rich in high-profile cases
- EPA increases ethanol in gasoline supply for 2016
- Storm dumps snow on Northern Plains
- House majority leader predicts no government shutdown over Planned Parenthood
- Atlantic Coast cities rise up against offshore drilling plans