House panel votes to sue Obama over health law implementation
WASHINGTON — Over Democratic objections, Republicans cleared the way on Thursday for a House vote on legislation authorizing an election-year lawsuit accusing President Obama of failing to implement the 4-year-old health care law as written.
The vote in the Rules Committee was 7-4, with all Republicans in favor and all Democrats opposed.
Republicans claim Obama is exceeding his authority by failing to carry out legislation that Congress passed and he signed into law.
Democrats counter that the suit is a political maneuver to improve Republican prospects in the November elections.
Democrats conceded that majority Republicans have enough votes to prevail when the measure comes to a vote in the next few days.
Republicans have long claimed that Obama has selectively enforced the health care law, pointing to a series of executive orders he has issued since its enactment. The administration disputes that view.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Unhappiness over plan to unfreeze billions in oil revenue for Iran threatens nuclear bill in Senate
- ‘Organic’ tag on water-raised produce raises ire
- House demands details of Taliban detainees swap for Bergdahl
- Florida fraternity members spit on disabled veterans at retreat
- Hostility at VA lingers, panel told
- Bomb threat clears Statue of Liberty
- 15 buffalo that escaped from farm killed in upstate N.Y.
- HIV cases tied to drug use multiply daily in Indiana
- Magma chamber spied under Yellowstone volcano
- Holder delivers farewell address
- Footage of protesters walking on flag sparks strife at Georgia university