House panel votes to sue Obama over health law implementation
WASHINGTON — Over Democratic objections, Republicans cleared the way on Thursday for a House vote on legislation authorizing an election-year lawsuit accusing President Obama of failing to implement the 4-year-old health care law as written.
The vote in the Rules Committee was 7-4, with all Republicans in favor and all Democrats opposed.
Republicans claim Obama is exceeding his authority by failing to carry out legislation that Congress passed and he signed into law.
Democrats counter that the suit is a political maneuver to improve Republican prospects in the November elections.
Democrats conceded that majority Republicans have enough votes to prevail when the measure comes to a vote in the next few days.
Republicans have long claimed that Obama has selectively enforced the health care law, pointing to a series of executive orders he has issued since its enactment. The administration disputes that view.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Police search for armed prisoner after hospital escape
- Indiana officials try to quell backlash over religious freedom law
- A revolt is growing as more people refuse to pay back student loans
- Federal agents charged with plundering online drug bazaar Silk Road
- Florida church bus crash kills 8
- Music festivals say ‘no’ to fans’ selfie sticks
- Supreme Court allows Obamacare’s Medicare costs board to stand
- FBI agent, 2 others sentenced in contractor kickback scheme in Utah
- Girl, 10, killed in Youngstown blaze was linked to rape case
- U.S. parks cope with aging visitor base
- 2nd suicide in a month jolts Missouri GOP