Witnesses added for Benghazi hearing
WASHINGTON — The special House committee investigating the 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi will hold its first public hearing in September about changes the State Department has made to better protect diplomats, Rep. Trey Gowdy said on Wednesday.
Gowdy, the committee's Republican chairman, said the panel is gaining access to witnesses who didn't participate in previous congressional investigations into the attacks.
“I know I'm biased, but one of the good parts about running an investigation in a way that appears to be serious-minded is that witnesses who were previously unavailable or not interested in cooperating are now interested in cooperating,” Gowdy said. “The universe of witnesses is expanding.”
House lawmakers formed the committee in May to review the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks that killed four Americans in eastern Libya, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens.
Several previous congressional investigations have looked at security lapses and intelligence failures related to the attacks, along with the military's response and whether President Obama's administration initially downplayed the incident for political reasons.
Gowdy said the panel is not scheduled to meet during the August congressional recess, but committee lawyers and investigators will be working.
On Tuesday, the 12 committee members — seven Republicans and five Democrats — met behind closed doors with family members of the four men killed in Benghazi on the 11th anniversary of the 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States.
Gowdy said the families were invited by him and the committee's Democratic vice chairman, Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland.
“One of the issues in homicide cases is that the jury knows more about the defendant and virtually nothing about the victim,” said Gowdy, a former prosecutor. “We wanted to give the family members a chance to tell us whatever was on their heart and mind.”
Gowdy said the GOP side of the committee has finished hiring staff. He said the staffers' professional backgrounds made them helpful in identifying new witnesses. The committee is expected to release information about the staffers soon.
“Once you convince people this is serious and fact-centric, and not an exercise in whatever pejorative you want to fill in, they are infinitely more likely to want to participate,” he said.
Democrats are also in the process of hiring committee staff. Although Democrats initially resisted the idea of a new Benghazi investigation — 13 congressional hearings and 50 briefings have been held — they agreed to participate.
House GOP leadership gave the panel a budget of $3.3 million.
Cummings on Tuesday referred questions about the panel's schedule to Gowdy.
The Spartanburg Republican, running for a third term, has said since May that the committee's investigation would be an objective search for facts, not a partisan attempt to smear Democrats ahead of the 2014 mid-term elections and the 2016 presidential race.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Supreme Court’s health care law ruling worries 34 states
- Homeland Security panned for passing on bio-threat technology
- Huge, ancient quasar could alter theories on black holes
- Paul edges Walker in CPAC straw poll
- Buffet: Berkshire’s built to last
- Most young Republicans back legal marijuana
- Florida fisherman’s high court win spurs call for legal reform
- Monarch butterflies find milkweed supply dwindles
- Perceived slights have some New Yorkers longing for Pennsylvania
- Gene making human brains bigger found
- Congress approves 1-week funding measure for Homeland Security