Credit-card-stealing virus 'Backoff' virtually undetectable, Homeland Security warns
The Department of Homeland Security warned retailers about a type of malicious software attacking point-of-sales systems, dubbed “Backoff,” that it said is undetectable by most types of anti-virus software.
The agency released a 10-page advisory about the payment-card-stealing virus on Thursday, saying it has been observed in at least three forensic investigations into breaches of payment systems.
The government has released reports on several types of malicious software that cybercriminals used to steal payment cards after last year's unprecedented breach on Target Corp, which resulted in the theft of about 40 million payment card numbers.
Backoff is a family of point-of-sale malware identified in October and with capabilities that include scraping memory for track data, logging keystrokes and injecting malicious stub into explorer.exe files, DHS said.
It said attackers use publicly available tools to find businesses that use remote desktop applications, then gain access to an administrative account to insert the malware.
The DHS advisory warned that such malware puts the business and consumer at risk, exposing data including names, credit card numbers, email addresses, mailing address and phone numbers.
“These breaches can impact a business' brand and reputation, while consumers' information can be used to make fraudulent purchases or risk compromise of bank accounts,” it said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- New York’s fracking ban starts clock for lawsuits
- Instances of hacking may be up, but indictments against Chinese military impactful, experts say
- Shark attacks spike in Carolinas
- Train derailment, fire prompts evacuation in Tennessee
- News Alert
- Missouri spells out eating disorder coverage for insurers
- Gay conversion therapy group committed fraud, New Jersey jury finds
- Civil rights groups welcome Supreme Court ruling on housing discrimination
- Former Los Angeles police officer who killed shares lessons
- Deaths from diabetes, heart disease, cancer blamed on sugary beverages
- Fires at black churches stir worst fears amid relative calm