California prisons alter treatment of mentally ill
SACRAMENTO — California prison officials on Friday pledged to take a gentler approach with mentally ill inmates.
The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation said in a federal court filing that it intends to change a systemwide protocol for restraining and isolating of 33,000 mentally ill offenders.
Several months ago, graphic images of prisoners being repeatedly doused with pepper spray in their cells were made public. Some of the mentally ill inmates were screaming and delirious.
The images spurred U.S. District Judge Lawrence Karlton to rule in April that California's treatment of such inmates violates their constitutional safeguards against cruel and unusual punishment.
Guards said they took the actions because the inmates refused to take their medications, would not leave their cells or defied orders in other ways.
The state now requires guards to consider the mental health condition of each inmate before using force and to employ the least amount of force necessary while seeking alternatives when there is no imminent threat of harm.
That generally requires guards to have a cool-down period before using force — time in which a mental health professional will try to intervene with the inmate.
Pepper spray cannot be used at all in many specialized mental health facilities within the prisons without the permission of a senior prison official.
Instead of physically dragging a combative inmate from a cell, guards will be allowed to enter the cell just long enough to administer the inmate's medication before withdrawing.
Attorneys representing inmates were cautiously optimistic, said Michael Bien, whose firm sued the state over its treatment of mentally ill inmates.
“It is going to be a culture change, a sea change, if they can actually do it,” he said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.