U.S. senator: CIA interrogation tactics helped get bin Laden
WASHINGTON — Republicans on the Senate Intelligence Committee soon will release a report asserting the CIA's use of harsh interrogation techniques helped bring down Osama bin Laden and disrupt terrorist plots, the panel's top Republican said on Sunday.
“Information gleaned from these interrogations was in fact used to interrupt and disrupt terrorist plots, including some information that took down bin Laden,” Sen. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia said on CBS' “Face the Nation.”
Democrats who control the Senate Intelligence Committee are expected to issue their own report that alleges the CIA techniques, such as waterboarding, did not help yield valuable intelligence and were not necessary.
The two reports will emerge five years after the committee authorized a probe into the CIA's possible use of torture after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
It is unclear when the Democrats' report will be released because Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who chairs the committee, has said she may challenge some redactions made by the Obama administration.
President Obama, who banned the practices after taking office in 2009, said on Friday that the CIA had “tortured some folks” during former President George W. Bush's administration.
“We did some things that were contrary to our values,” Obama said.
Republicans on the committee have long disagreed with Democrats about the use of the so-called enhanced interrogation techniques, and they largely boycotted the committee's probe.
“I thought it was a mistake then. I still think it is a mistake,” Chambliss said on CBS.
The investigation has been plagued with difficulties. The CIA conceded last week that it had improperly monitored computers used by committee investigators looking into the torture allegations.
The revelation prompted two Democratic senators to call for the resignation of CIA Director John Brennan, who took over the spy agency last year.
Senate committee members appearing on Sunday television news shows did not call for Brennan's resignation, but they said the CIA had committed a breach of trust that needs to be addressed.
Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain, a survivor of torture, said on the Fox News program “Sunday Morning Futures” that he is in some ways more concerned about the CIA spying on Senate staffers than the torture issue, and he called for an independent investigation.
U.S. Rep. Mike Rogers of Michigan, the Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, warned against overreacting.
“I don't think this is some conspiracy notion that they wanted to spy on either of our committees. That would of course be intolerable. I think it would be a crime,” Rogers said on CNN's “State of the Union.”
But these were CIA computers at a CIA facility, he said. “That's a little bit different than spying on Congress.”
Sen. Angus King, who sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said the CIA's biggest mistake on the interrogations was not being able to admit a mistake.
“They're still trying to justify it and argue it wasn't torture, which is nonsense,” the Maine independent said on CNN. “I think we could put this behind us. But they keep, they keep trying to justify it. And it's unjustifiable.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Surge in small drones making airline pilots nervous
- Oregon recounts votes on measure to label GMO foods
- Boston airport’s ‘naked man’ remains behind bars
- E-cigarettes cut cravings, study finds
- Test vaccine to fight Ebola promising
- Fissures begin to emerge among Dems
- House ethics panel defers campaign finance investigation of New York Rep. Grimm
- Fewer adults smoking, U.S. survey finds
- Liberal Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg has stent placed in heart artery
- Rookie Cleveland police officer acted within 2 seconds to shoot 12-year-old boy
- Supreme Court will hear challenge to EPA’s power-plant rules