Share This Page

New York man who filmed deadly chokehold arrested on weapons charge

| Sunday, Aug. 3, 2014, 8:51 p.m.

The New York man who recorded a cellphone video of police placing Eric Garner in a chokehold has been arrested on a weapons charge, police said on Sunday.

Ramsey Orta, 22, was leaving a Staten Island hotel with a 17-year-old girl late on Saturday when officers saw him place a .25 caliber semiautomatic handgun in the waistband of the girl's pants, police said. The gun had been reported stolen in Michigan in 2007, police said.

Orta was in the hospital on Sunday, police said, but refused to disclose further information about why he was there or his condition, citing privacy laws. It was unclear whether he had a lawyer.

Orta recorded the roughly three-minute video on July 17, in which Garner, 43, can be seen arguing with police officers trying to arrest him on charges of selling single, untaxed cigarettes. Garner complained that he couldn't breathe and soon died.

A woman who identified herself as Orta's grandmother, Annie Monteczuma, said that she did not know why he was hospitalized, nor did she know whether he had a lawyer.

“I just saw today that he was arrested and was in the hospital in the papers,” Monteczuma said.

The Rev. Al Sharpton said Orta's arrest has “no bearing on the case or the movement of justice” regarding Garner's death.

“Let us be clear that the tape that Ramsey recorded has now been validated by the medical examiner's report,” Sharpton said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.