Breach at fed contractor likely results in stolen data
WASHINGTON — A major federal contractor that conducts background checks for the Department of Homeland Security has suffered a computer breach that likely resulted in the theft of employees' personal information, officials said on Wednesday.
The company, USIS, said in a statement that the intrusion “has all the markings of a state-sponsored attack.”
The breach, discovered recently, prompted DHS to suspend all work with USIS as the FBI begins an investigation. It's unclear how many employees were affected, but officials said they believe the breach did not affect employees outside DHS. Still, the Office of Personnel Management has also suspended work with the company “out of an abundance of caution,”a senior administration official said.
“Our forensic analysis has concluded that some DHS personnel may have been affected, and DHS has notified its entire workforce” of the breach, department spokesman Peter Boogaard said. “We are committed to ensuring our employees' privacy and are taking steps to protect it.”
The intrusion is not believed to be related to a March incident in which OPM's databases were hacked, said officials, some of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak for attribution. That intrusion was traced to China and none of the personal data, which was encrypted, were stolen.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Obama: U.S. embassy in Havana marks ‘new chapter’ in Cuba ties
- Fires at black churches stir worst fears amid relative calm
- Official: Fire at South Carolina black church wasn’t arson
- FDA review of OxyContin abuse-deterrent version put on hold by maker
- NSA resumes collection of phone data
- NBC dumps Trump’s beauty pageants
- Supreme Court to take up mandated dues for public employees unions in next term
- Counties defy same-sex marriage ruling
- New York prison chief, 11 employees put on leave in escape
- Advocate pushes IRS on nonprofits’ tax forms
- Civil rights groups welcome Supreme Court ruling on housing discrimination