Heartland set to bust corn, soy crop records, U.S. reports
DES MOINES — A mild summer across much of the nation's heartland has provided optimum growing conditions for the nation's corn and soybean crops. Pair that with high-yield seeds and other new farming technologies, and the United States is looking at busting records come harvest time.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture has predicted a record soybean crop of 3.8 billion bushels. And the corn crop, it said in July, would be large but not bigger than last year's record of 13.9 billion bushels. However, many market analysts and some farmers expect the USDA to revise expectations upward in a report based on field surveys that's due on Tuesday.
“Conditions look just fantastic across most of the country,” Texas A&M University grain marketing economist Mark Welch said.
In a typical growing season, at least some corn-growing states would have experienced drought or other production problems. But the 18 states that grow 91 percent of the nation's corn have experienced nearly ideal conditions this year, as adequate rain fell when plants emerged and cooler summer temperatures minimized heat stress.
That's the case in Illinois, one of the nation's top corn and soybean states.
“Illinois has largely been dealt to date pretty close to a royal flush on weather, and I'm sure that the yields are going to be very high here,” said Scott Irwin, a University of Illinois professor of agricultural and consumer economics.
The expected large harvest has driven corn and soybean prices significantly lower, but it is not expected to make much of a short-time difference in consumer food prices. However, since the grains are staples in livestock feed, lower prices eventually could lead to a decline in the cost of beef, pork, chicken and milk.
“Eventually the economics will feed through, but I wouldn't expect much relief in 2015 yet. It just takes time to go through the systems,” Irwin said.
Weather doesn't deserve all the credit for the amount of grain farmers are getting from each acre this year.
Agriculture companies have developed genetic characteristics in seeds that allow plants to be packed more densely per acre and arm them with resistance to drought, disease, and pests. In addition, larger planters and tractors equipped with GPS programs can run at night if needed, helping farmers adjust planting when weather delays field work.
“When conditions are right, we have the ability to get in and get that crop established so much more quickly than we could in the past,” Welch said. “... We're just creating an environment that when the weather cooperates, we're capturing more of the potential and the possibilities genetically that are within that corn plant.”
During the lifetime of the average U.S. farmer, who's 58, corn yields have more than tripled from a national average of 44 bushels per acre in the 1950s to nearly 150 bushels per acre in recent years.
The USDA had estimated 165.3 bushels per acre this year, and some analysts are speculating about exceeding 170 bushels per acre.
The record soybean yield also came in 2009, an average of 44 bushels per acre for a 3.36 billion-bushel harvest. The USDA expects a national average of 45.2 bushels per acre and a crop of 3.8 billion bushels this fall.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Dusty Atlantic Ocean thwarts tropical storms
- Clintons hauled in $139M in past 8 years
- Planned Parenthood recordings release halted by judge
- Analysts expect French laboratory will be able to provide details from examination of jet part
- Fires’ fury unabated in California
- Baltimore slayings climb to level unseen in decades
- Amid 4-year drought, fears rise of trees dying, falling in California
- Suspect in South Carolina church shooting wants to plead guilty to hate crimes, attorney says
- Despite U.S. dollars and bombs, effort failing to squash ISIS
- Global lion population falling primarily because of loss of habitat, experts say
- Feds eye use of federal dollars for ads for for-profit colleges