Witnesses: Mo. man had hands raised when he was shot
FERGUSON, Mo. — The hands of a black man who was fatally shot by a police officer were raised when the officer approached with his weapon drawn and fired repeatedly, according to two men who said they witnessed the shooting that sparked a night of unrest in suburban St. Louis.
The FBI opened an investigation on Monday into the death of 18-year-old Michael Brown, who police said was shot multiple times on Saturday during a confrontation with an officer in Ferguson, a suburb of 21,000 that's nearly 70 percent black.
Authorities were vague about exactly what led the officer to open fire, except to say that the shooting was preceded by a scuffle. It was unclear whether Brown or a man he was with was involved in the altercation.
Investigators have refused to publicly disclose the race of the officer, who is on administrative leave. But Phillip Walker said he was on the porch of an apartment complex overlooking the scene when he heard a shot and saw a white officer with Brown on the street.
Brown “was giving up in the sense of raising his arms and being subdued,” Walker said.
The family had planned to drop their son off at a technical college on Monday to begin his studies.
“Instead of celebrating his future, they are having to plan his funeral,” said Benjamin Crump, a family attorney who represented Trayvon Martin's relatives after he was slain in 2012 in Florida.
“I don't want to sugarcoat it,” Crump added. Brown “was executed in broad daylight.”
The FBI is looking into possible civil rights violations, said Cheryl Mimura, a spokeswoman for the agency's St. Louis field office.
Attorney General Eric Holder said the case deserves a full review.
Nearly three dozen people were arrested when a candlelight vigil Sunday night was followed by crowds looting and burning stores, vandalizing vehicles, assaulting and threatening reporters and taunting officers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Judge orders W.Va. agency to release pollution data
- Man caught jumping White House fence
- Coburn’s final ‘Wastebook’ tallies $25B in what he considers ‘pork’
- Coast Guard to seek billions to protect Arctic interests
- 4 private security guards convicted
- Personal use of Secret Service agents on staffer’s behalf draws investigaton
- Social Security recipients to get increase in benefits
- 8 arrested in post-game riots in Morgantown
- Security at Capitol questioned
- Academic scandal at University of North Carolina bigger than previously reported
- Ferguson slaying of Brown reconstructed in county autopsy