Woman, 5 children held hostage in home
HARVEY, Ill. — Authorities were negotiating on Tuesday with two men barricaded in a home and holding a woman and five children hostage in south suburban Chicago. At least one of the men was thought to be armed.
Officers, including a SWAT team, surrounded the home about five hours after the initial report.
Negotiators from the Illinois State Police and Cook County Sheriff's Department were communicating with the hostage-takers, police said.
The standoff in Harvey followed a 911 call about a burglary in progress and the subsequent wounding of two police officers in an exchange of gunfire.
Harvey city spokesman Sean Howard said authorities don't know the hostage-takers but have identified the hostages. They would not comment on the relationship between the hostages, but the woman is believed to be a nurse.
“Right now we don't want to jeopardize the integrity of negotiation process,” Howard said. “We want to protect those children as much as we can. The less information right now the better.”
Two police officers were wounded by gunfire after responding to the 12:43 p.m. burglary report, Howard said.
Officer Darnell Keel, an 18-year veteran of the police force, was in stable condition at a hospital with a broken arm after an exchange of gunfire and would undergo surgery, Howard said. A second officer suffered a graze wound to an arm.
Twenty-six law enforcement agencies were assisting, Howard said. An armored vehicle and officers in body armor with high-powered rifles could be seen in the neighborhood. The state police SWAT team was on the scene, said Illinois State Police spokeswoman Monique Bond.
A nearby middle school was evacuated, but only staff and not students were in the building.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.