Feds to protect 20 coral species
WASHINGTON — The federal government is protecting 20 types of colorful coral by putting them on the list of threatened species, partly because of climate change.
As with the polar bear, much of the threat to the coral species is because of expected problems caused by global warming, said David Bernhart, an endangered-species official at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. These coral species are being hurt by climate change “but not to the point that they are endangered yet,” he said.
Climate change is making the oceans warmer, more acidic and helping with coral diseases like bleaching — and those “are the major threats” explaining why the species were put on the threatened list, Bernhart said on Wednesday in a conference call.
Other threats include overfishing, runoff from the land, and some coastal construction, but those are lesser, Bernhart said.
Five species can be found off the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts of Florida, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. They include pillar coral, rough cactus coral and three species of star coral. The other 15 are in the Pacific Ocean area near Guam and American Samoa, but not Hawaii.
The agency looked at 66 species, but decided on 20 to join two species listed.
Coral reefs, which are in trouble worldwide, are important fish habitats.
The agency set no new rules yet that would prevent coral from being harvested or damaged.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- FCC plays net traffic cop
- ‘Dysfunctional relationship’ between Obama, Netanyahu grows
- Gene making human brains bigger found
- Hackers won’t take break if DHS shuts down, officials warn
- Justices seem sympathetic to hijab-wearing interviewee
- 2 arrested in U.S. tried to join ISIS, feds say
- Insanity defense a tough sell in ‘American Sniper’ case
- Kibble killing dogs, lawsuit claims
- Cuts curtail IRS customer service
- Regulators approve tougher rules for Internet providers
- Foreign government gifts to family charity present candidacy hurdle for Hillary Clinton