AFL-CIO's Trumka urges action to push the political left to polls
WASHINGTON — AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka wants President Obama to go “bold” on immigration to energize the political left going into the November election.
“No matter what he does, the right wing will go bonkers,” Trumka said on Thursday at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast. “We think that he should take affirmative action with workers to let them come out of the shadows. We think that he should take back enforcement of immigration laws from the states and the cities.”
AFL-CIO leaders have had “significant meetings” at the White House with Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, who is leading the Obama administration's effort to come up with an executive order, Trumka said.
Johnson “will be very instrumental in formulating the president's policy,” the AFL-CIO president predicted.
Johnson served as general counsel at the Defense Department during Obama's first term. In that position, he co-chaired a 10-month defense study on the possible impact of repealing the “don't ask, don't tell” policy that paved the way for a congressional vote.
Johnson also is credited with defending continued use of the 2001 congressional authorization for the use of military force to fight terrorism, helping to explain how the authorization applies to al-Qaida and associated groups.
“The president brought him in because of his expertise,” Trumka said. “He's done a tremendous amount of study. He's met with every constituency out there.” He's given people tremendous opportunity for input so that he could learn and he could get a broad understanding. The president delayed the outcome of his report so he could have more time to study it.”
If the president's executive order isn't based on Johnson's recommendation, Trumka said, “Then I wonder why they went through all that effort.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.