ShareThis Page

Montana lawmakers pitch 85 mph speed limit on interstates

| Sunday, Nov. 30, 2014, 8:27 p.m.

HELENA, Mont. — Four state lawmakers are drafting bills for next year's legislative session that would raise the daytime speed limit on Montana interstate highways from 75 to 80 and possibly as high as 85 mph.

State Rep. Mike Miller, R-Helmville, and state Rep.-elect Art Wittich, R-Bozeman, said Utah, Wyoming and Idaho have raised their speed limits above 75, and they haven't had any problems.

“I just think our roads are engineered well, and technology is such we can drive those roads safely,” Wittich said.

Montanans want to be able to drive faster, he said, and should have the freedom to do so.

Sens. Scott Sales, R-Bozeman, and Jonathan Windy Boy, D-Box Elder, also are backing speed-limit bills.

Montana Highway Patrol Col. Tom Butler declined to comment on the bills until he has a chance to see them, but he told the Missoulian that driving faster reduces reaction time and makes stopping more difficult.

“Our overall goal is to keep everyone in one piece and get them home safe,” Butler said. “Most crashes are a whole lot of little things that come together and become one big thing.”

Windy Boy said he travels around the country to dance at Native American powwows and has driven in states with 80 mph speed limits.

“As big a state as Montana is, for the most part, the traffic is pretty sparse,” he said. “Once in a while, it helps to get from Point A to Point B a little quicker.”

Sales said he spent seven months working in the Bakken oil patch, driving back and forth to Bozeman regularly.

“If I could drive 85 mph on the interstate, it would save an hour,” Sales said.

He said the speed limit in his bill is negotiable. “Eighty-five would be fine with me,” he said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.