ShareThis Page

Search for less-invasive avenue for brain surgery leads to eyelid, UPMC surgical team

| Sunday, Feb. 1, 2015, 7:27 p.m.

WASHINGTON — Doctor after doctor said removing the tumor causing Pamela Shavaun Scott's unrelenting headaches would require cutting open the top of her skull and pushing aside her brain. Then one offered a startling shortcut — operating through her eyelid.

The idea: Make a small incision right in the crease and sneak past the eyeball into the hard-to-reach center of the head.

“The nice thing about it is we have to saw off much less of your head” was how Dr. S. Tonya Stefko of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center explained it.

Less-invasive brain surgery is not common, but surgeons are working out different ways to get to tumors, aneurysms and other problems without as much trauma in hopes that patients recover faster. Scott's experience shows how difficult it can be for patients to learn about alternative options like the eyelid approach — performed by a small number of highly specialized surgical teams — or even to know what to ask.

Scott knew that major medical centers often offer second-opinion consultations for long-distance patients, and started hunting — aided when her husband used a 3D printer to make a life-size model of her skull with her tumor, a meningioma growing behind her left eye, for surgeons to examine.

“The sad thing is that people don't know there are other options than what their small-town doctor is telling them,” said Scott, 56, who traveled from her home in Morro Bay, Calif., to Pittsburgh for the surgery. “I feel like a walking miracle.”

Reaching that spot above and behind the eyes, the underside of the brain, is a challenge. Traditional surgery means a large opening in the skull to give doctors plenty of room to maneuver. But they must move painstakingly past sections of healthy brain, and Scott was warned that because her tumor was in such a tough location, vision or even cognitive damage was a risk of that top-down surgery.

Sometimes, surgeons can snake their tools through the nasal passages instead, a straighter shot through a natural opening.

Now the eye is offering some paths into this difficult region, too.

Think of the eye socket like an ice cream cone, with the tip pointing back toward the brain's center, said Dr. Paul Gardner, director of UPMC's Center for Skull Base Surgery. Entering through the eyelid crease, surgeons can follow that cone to just the right spot to access the brain — removing a bit of bone about the size of two postage stamps from the inside.

Entering the socket at a different angle, doctors also can make a cut in the crow's feet at the corner of the eye. Or they can hide an incision in the eyebrow, making a small hole in the skull just above the eye.

Dr. Robert Harbaugh, president of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, cautioned that transorbital approaches have not been formally studied to compare ultimate outcomes, including safety, to traditional open surgery.

“This is worth exploring,” he said. But, “because it's new doesn't mean it's necessarily better.”

The surgery is only for carefully selected patients, stressed Dr. Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa, a Johns Hopkins University neurosurgeon who co-authored one of the first medical journal reports on the eyelid method a few years ago.

Tumors cannot be too big. No important nerves can be in the way; he also turns away people with large sinuses, to be sure there's room to get by. He calls infection the main risk.

And it can be done only by a specialized team with experience in both the eye and the brain, added Gardner, who will present some of Pittsburgh's cases at a medical meeting. Stefko, UPMC's director of orbital and oculoplastic surgery, has the job of protecting the eyeball, making the corridor for the neurosurgeons to work.

Those kinds of multidisciplinary teams are rare, limiting wider adoption of these techniques, said Quinones-Hinojosa.

“You really have to learn how to be co-captains. Medicine and surgery hasn't been, traditionally, like that,” he said.

For California's Scott, it took a few hours longer to remove her meningioma — a benign tumor that started in the brain's protective covering and grew into the bone and near her optic nerve — through the small opening. But she awoke with essentially a black eye and was back at work in her psychotherapy practice in two weeks, wearing sunglasses.

In Indianapolis, dentist Deborah Boyer underwent a similar months-long search to treat a meningioma growing around critical nerves and blood vessels, threatening her vision and motor function. She wanted both a brain and an eye specialist. So she read medical journals online and hunted designated “centers of excellence.”

Pittsburgh's Gardner initially planned to cut through the side of her skull, a smaller operation than other doctors offered, but later decided the corner of her eye offered a good path. Boyer said it took twice as long as regular surgery, but she was discharged pain-free in four days.

“People need help to try to get connected more quickly, and to know what those options are,” she said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.