ShareThis Page

Teens' e-cigarette use linked with later smoking

| Sunday, Aug. 23, 2015, 7:12 p.m.

CHICAGO — Teens who use e-cigarettes are more likely than others to later smoke conventional cigarettes and other tobacco products, a study at 10 Los Angeles high schools suggests.

The study doesn't prove that electronic cigarettes are a “gateway drug,” but some doctors say it bolsters arguments that the devices should be strictly regulated as proposed by the Food and Drug Administration.

Whether teens had tried just one e-cigarette or were habitual users isn't known, nor is whether they became heavy smokers or just had a few puffs. That information would be needed to help determine whether nicotine from e-cigarettes predisposed users to seek out other sources.

Despite those limitations, the study “is the strongest evidence to date that e-cigarettes might pose a health hazard by encouraging adolescents to start smoking conventional tobacco products,” said Dr. Nancy Rigotti, director of a tobacco research and treatment center at Massachusetts General Hospital. Her commentary and the study were both published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

E-cigarettes haven't been extensively studied, and there's no scientific consensus on any potential benefits or harms, including whether they lead kids to become regular smokers.

The new, government-funded study involved about 2,500 14-year-olds who had never used conventional tobacco products, including cigarettes. Students were first surveyed in fall 2013. The Los Angeles study population was diverse, but whether the same results would be found nationwide is uncertain.

At the start, about 9 percent — 222 kids — said they had used e-cigarettes at least once, similar to rates seen in a recent national survey. Almost one-third of them tried cigarettes, cigars or water pipes within the following six months, versus just 8 percent of the kids who'd never tried e-cigarettes. The gap persisted when students were surveyed again, a year after the study began.

Hookahs and cigars were more popular than regular cigarettes in both groups.

The researchers considered traits that might make teens more likely to use tobacco, including impulsiveness, delinquent behavior and parents' smoking habits. Their analysis showed those traits played a role but didn't fully explain the link between e-cigarettes and later tobacco use.

University of Southern California researcher Adam Leventhal, the study's lead author, noted that e-cigarettes were initially introduced as a potentially safer alternative to tobacco for smokers who were trying to cut down, but they have evolved into a recreational product for some users.

Available for nearly a decade, e-cigarettes are battery-powered devices that turn nicotine-containing liquid into vapor that is inhaled. Though nicotine can be addictive, e-cigarettes lack the chemicals and tars of burning tobacco.

National data show e-cigarettes have become more popular among teens than regular cigarettes.

Leventhal said his study “does little to dispel concerns that recreational e-cigarette use might be associated with moving on to these very harmful tobacco products.” But he said more research is needed to determine whether e-cigarettes are really the culprit.

University of Rochester tobacco researcher Deborah Ossip said because teens' brains are still developing, they're more sensitive to the effects of nicotine and that using just a few e-cigarettes could make them vulnerable to using nicotine in other forms. She had no role in the research.

The FDA in 2014 proposed rules that would ban the sale of electronic cigarettes to minors and would add the devices to the list of tobacco products it regulates. Laws banning the sale of e-cigarettes to minors have been enacted or proposed in several states.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.